Which climate policies have been most effective around the world?

Publicly released:
Australia; International
Story by Rachel McDonald, Australian Science Media Centre. Photo by Tim van der Kuip on Unsplash.
Story by Rachel McDonald, Australian Science Media Centre. Photo by Tim van der Kuip on Unsplash.

Carbon pricing and taxation policies have been among the most effective emissions reduction policies adopted around the world, according to an international assessment of policies across 40 countries since 1990. The researchers say up to 2022, it has been the countries with a broad mix of climate policies that have had the most success at reducing emissions, rather than those that have relied on a single measure. Looking at what each country could change to make the biggest improvements from here, the researchers identify Australia as one of the countries with the highest potential to improve their performance on climate action by increasing fossil fuel excise taxes.

News release

From: Taylor and Francis Group

To reduce CO2 emissions, policy on carbon pricing, taxation and investment in renewable energy is key

A new peer-reviewed study evaluating climate policies in 40 countries over a 32-year period finds that carbon pricing and taxation—combined with investments in renewable energy and research—are among the most effective tools governments can use to reduce COemissions.

Drawing on successful examples such as Sweden and Norway, which have implemented a broad mix of climate policies at varying levels of stringency, the authors conclude that countries benefit most from a comprehensive and diverse policy toolkit rather than reliance on a single measure.

The research team—comprising experts from the University of Barcelona, the University of Lausanne, LMU Munich, and the University of Oslo—emphasizes that effective climate action does not depend on identifying one “optimal” policy. Instead, policy effectiveness emerges from the implementation of multiple measures over time.

Published today in Climate Policy, the study provides a country-specific assessment of where additional climate action could deliver the greatest emissions reductions. It evaluates the effectiveness of individual climate policies during periods of sustained policy expansion, using a novel methodological approach that explicitly models multiple climate policy parameters simultaneously.

The analysis highlights countries such as Australia, Canada, and Japan as having substantial potential to strengthen their climate performance by increasing fossil fuel excise taxes.

In addition, the paper:

  • identifies a set of core climate policy measures that consistently strengthen climate ambition across different national policy mixes, offering practical guidance for policymakers; and
  • introduces a new methodological toolkit that enables more comprehensive evaluation of climate policies and can be applied to other policy areas experiencing rapid expansion.

Summarizing the findings, lead author Dr Yves Steinebach, from the Department of Political Science at the University of Oslo, says: “As governments expand their climate policy efforts, evaluating effectiveness has become increasingly challenging due to the growing number of coexisting policies.

“Our findings help decision-makers identify which climate policies are most likely to be effective in their national context.”

Commenting on the significance of the study, Dr Pieter Pauw, Editor-in-Chief of Climate Policy, adds: “The need for effective climate policies is growing, as is their complexity. This paper offers a rigorous analysis and timely insights that can help countries curb carbon dioxide emissions more effectively.”

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research Taylor and Francis Group, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Journal/
conference:
Climate Policy
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: University of Barcelona, Spain, University of Oslo, Norway
Funder: XFM, MH, CK and YS acknowledge funding from the European Research Council (grant number 788941 – ACCUPOL) and by the Norwegian Research Council (grant number 335073 – ACCELZ Project).
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.