Shingles treatment shows 'concerning' variations

Embargoed until: Publicly released:

There are concerning variations in how a form of shingles in treated, say Australian researchers. Known as herpes zoster ophthalmicus, this form of shingles effects the eye and occurs in about 10 per cent of patients. The study of 100 patients presenting to a hospital eye clinic found that only 16 had treatment started at the recommended dose, prior to attending the clinic. They say the findings suggest that education of all health care professionals involved in the care of patients with this condition needs to be improved, and clinical practice guidelines must provide clear and consistent information about treatment.

Journal/conference: MJA

Link to research (DOI): 10.5694/mja2.50554

Organisation/s: Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital

Funder: Competing interests: No relevant disclosures.

Media Release

From: Medical Journal of Australia (MJA)

SHINGLES TREATMENT SHOWS “CONCERNING” VARIATIONS

DOCTOR education about herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO) – a form of shingles which affects the nerve shared by the eye and its accessory structures – needs improvement, given the incidence of herpes zoster presentations to GPs almost doubling over the past decade.

HZO is caused by reactivation of latent varicella zoster virus, and effects about 10% of herpes zoster patients.

The authors of a research letter published online today by the Medical Journal of Australia found “concerning variations in timing and practice of treating HZO”, after analysing data from digital health records of the first 100 consecutive patients who presented to The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital (Eye and Ear) emergency department with HZO during July 2017 – July 2018.

“Sixty-five patients initially presented to their GP, 20 to a hospital emergency department, and 15 directly to the Eye and Ear,” wrote the authors, led by Dr Rahul Chakrabarti, an ophthalmologist at the Eye and Ear.

“The mean time between rash onset and presentation to a GP or emergency department was 3.3 days. For 51 patients, treatment commenced before presentation to the Eye and Ear (famciclovir, 27; valaciclovir, 16; acyclovir, 6; two patients had received no topical treatment); treatment had commenced within 72 hours of the rash developing for 36 of these patients (71%).

“The recommended dose and frequency were prescribed for 16 of the 51 patients. For 29 patients, antiviral therapy was prescribed at lower than the recommended dose or prescribed as a topical treatment; the prescribing information was not documented for five patients.

“Nineteen of the 68 patients who attended follow-up 7–14 days after their initial presentation to the Eye and Ear presented with ocular symptoms regarded as late complications, including four with more than one complication. Eight of 29 patients (29%) who had not commenced systemic antiviral therapy within 72 hours of rash onset developed late complications, and 13 of 71 patients (18%) who were treated within 72 hours.”

The authors wrote that the variations in timing and treatment could have been caused by diagnostic uncertainty caused by the variability of clinical signs during the early stages of HZO, and by an “earlier discrepancy between the famciclovir dosing recommended by therapeutic guidelines (250 mg three times a day) and recommendations based upon the results of a clinical trial (500 mg three times a day)”.

“This discrepancy has since been resolved in the therapeutic guidelines.”

The authors concluded that the education of all health care professionals involved in the care of patients with HZO “needs to be improved”.

“Clinical practice guidelines must provide clear and consistent information about managing HZO.”

Please remember to credit The MJA.

The Medical Journal of Australia is a publication of the Australian Medical Association.

The statements or opinions that are expressed in the MJA reflect the views of the authors and do not represent the official policy of the AMA or the MJA unless that is so stated.

Attachments:

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public

  • Medical Journal of Australia (MJA)
    Web page
    Please link to the article in online versions of your report (the URL will go live after the embargo ends).

News for:

Australia
VIC

Media contact details for this story are only visible to registered journalists.