Most COVID-19 trial preprints were eventually published, and the conclusions mostly stayed the same

Embargoed until: Publicly released:
Peer-reviewed: This work was reviewed and scrutinised by relevant independent experts.

Observational study: A study in which the subject is observed to see if there is a relationship between two or more things (eg: the consumption of diet drinks and obesity). Observational studies cannot prove that one thing causes another, only that they are linked.

During the pandemic, preprints helped make clinical trial results available as quickly as possible, and now researchers have found that most preprints of COVID-19 clinical trials ended up being published in a peer-reviewed journal. The researchers found that preprint studies with smaller numbers of participants (sample size) and higher risk of bias were less likely to be published. They also found that, although there were differences in the reported outcomes, analyses and results between the preprint and final publication, the main conclusions remained the same for the majority of studies.

Journal/conference: JAMA Network Open

Link to research (DOI): 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.53301

Organisation/s: Queen’s University, Canada

Funder: Dr Loeb reported serving on advisory boards for Sanofi, Pfizer, Medicago, Merck, Seqirus, Paladin Labs, and GlaxoSmithKline aswell as on committees for Medicago, CanSino Biologics (data safety and monitoring), the National Institutes of Health, and theWorld Health Organization Essential Medicines List AntibioticWorking Group outside the submitted work. No

Attachments:

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public

  • JAMA
    Web page
    Please link to the article in online versions of your report (the URL will go live after the embargo ends).

News for:

International

Media contact details for this story are only visible to registered journalists.