CC:0
CC:0

EXPERT REACTION: Could a little caffeine during your pregnancy make your offspring short?

Embargoed until: Publicly released:
Peer-reviewed: This work was reviewed and scrutinised by relevant independent experts.

Observational study: A study in which the subject is observed to see if there is a relationship between two or more things (eg: the consumption of diet drinks and obesity). Observational studies cannot prove that one thing causes another, only that they are linked.

People: This is a study based on research using people.

International researchers suggest even a little bit of caffeine while you're pregnant might be linked to your kids being short. The team followed up children of women who had low levels of caffeine and paraxanthine (a metabolite of caffeine) during their pregnancy at ages four to eight years, and say these kids were shorter than the kids of women who had no caffeine during their pregnancy. Although the clinical implications are unclear for relatively small observed differences, the team says the findings suggest that small amounts of daily maternal caffeine consumption are associated with shorter stature in their offspring that persist into childhood.

Journal/conference: JAMA Network Open

Link to research (DOI): 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.39609

Organisation/s: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, USA

Funder: This researchwas supported, in part, by the Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health, under award number UG3OD023316; and, in part, with Federal funds for the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Fetal Growth Studies–Singletons (contract numbers HHSN275200800013C, HHSN275200800002I, HHSN27500006, HHSN275200800003IC, HHSN275200800014C, HHSN275200800012C, HHSN275200800028C, and HHSN275201000009C). Drs Gleason, Sundaram, Gilman, and Grantz have contributed to thiswork as part of their official duties as employees of the US federal government.

From: JAMA

Expert Reaction

These comments have been collated by the Science Media Centre to provide a variety of expert perspectives on this issue. Feel free to use these quotes in your stories. Views expressed are the personal opinions of the experts named. They do not represent the views of the SMC or any other organisation unless specifically stated.

Associate Professor Alex Polyakov is a Clinical Associate Professor at the Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne and a Consultant Obstetrician, Gynaecologist and Fertility Specialist at the Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne. He is a Medical Director of Genea Fertility Melbourne.

Consumption of coffee in pregnancy is an area of extensive research and there are multiple studies, which often produce conflicting results. Investigators have looked at coffee consumption and infertility risk/fertility treatment outcomes, risks of miscarriage, risk of gestational diabetes/preeclampsia/preterm labour, children’s weight/height/BMI, among many other outcomes.

This study is just the latest in a very long list of retrospective studies which assess the association of coffee consumption in pregnancy with offspring’s anthropometric outcomes, such as weight and height. This type of study is somewhat controversial since it can only demonstrate an association, not causation. The underlying assumption is that women who consume less coffee are identical in all respects to women who consume more, and authors go to great length to ensure that this is the case by using quite sophisticated statistical techniques.

Unfortunately, this “singular difference” cannot ever be completely achieved. It is possible, perhaps even likely, that those who drink more coffee may have other significant differences in their diet, lifestyle or some other unknown factor that would explain the findings and coffee consumption is not causally linked to the outcomes under study. Furthermore, when sophisticated statistical modelling is used and multiple outcomes are examined simultaneously, the possibility of finding a statistically significant association increases. The clinical or practical relevance of such findings is questionable. It is no coincidence that these types of studies are often referred to as a “fishing expedition”. If you fish long enough and use different fishing techniques, eventually you will catch a fish, even though it may be too small to feed you.

There are however some facts that are not controversial. Fact one: coffee has no nutritional value and therefore is not essential for a healthy pregnancy. Fact two: caffeine is present in low amounts in other beverages and foods, apart from coffee, such as tea and chocolate as well as many soft drinks, so complete avoidance is possible but may be difficult to achieve. Fact three: moderation is the key – it is probably true that excessive amounts of any product consumed during pregnancy may be associated with possible harms. This is true for coffee, but it is also true for meat and fish.

A healthy balanced diet is the best possible strategy and a small amount of coffee is rather unlikely to result in significant harm to either a pregnant person, or the offspring, notwithstanding the findings of this study. Advice to unnecessarily restrict pregnant women’s diets may in fact be counterproductive and create anxiety and the feeling of guilt should women not be able to adhere to them. The bottom line is that if one’s wellbeing is enhanced by having a cup of coffee, there is most likely no harm in having it.

Last updated: 31 Oct 2022 1:31pm
Declared conflicts of interest:
None declared.
Dr Gavin Pereira is a Professor of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at Curtin University

There remains insufficient evidence that caffeine during pregnancy hampers the growth of their subsequently born children. The study by Gleason and others published in JAMA Network Open neither changes this conclusion nor contributes to the body of evidence on the topic. The researchers' attempt to control for confounding was severely limited to the little information that was available to them.

Their conclusion that "increasing levels" of caffeine and paraxanthine, even in low amounts, was associated with shorter stature in early childhood is incorrect. This conclusion indirectly implies that as their consumption of caffeine increases, risk of shorter stature also increases. Rather, all that can be concluded from this study is that the children born to women who consumed higher levels of caffeine were shorter than the children born to women who consumed relatively lower levels of caffeine. The correlation observed in this study can be explained by the existence of a common cause of both caffeine consumption and growth restriction e.g., poverty, stress, and dietary factors.

Last updated: 31 Oct 2022 3:56pm
Declared conflicts of interest:
None declared.
Melanie McGrice is an Advanced Accredited Practising Dietitian with a Masters degree in nutrition. She is a founding member of the Early Life Nutrition Coalition.

As a prenatal dietitian I find that many pregnant mums are confused by guidelines that suggest caffeine doses as they don’t understand what this translates to in terms of food and beverage consumption. This study found that even 50mg/day of caffeine may have a significant impact on children’s height. Fifty mg/day is equivalent to approximately one cup of tea or half a cup of instant coffee or a family-sized block of chocolate.

This study adds to the growing body of evidence that caffeine intake during pregnancy has a more significant impact than was once thought, and given there are no advantages for caffeine intake during pregnancy, it seems prudent to advise pregnant women to avoid caffeine intake if possible.

Last updated: 31 Oct 2022 1:28pm
Declared conflicts of interest:
None.

News for:

International
VIC
WA

Media contact details for this story are only visible to registered journalists.