Where are seabirds most at risk of harm from plastic pollution?

Publicly released:
International
Bethany Clark
Bethany Clark

Seabirds are being predominantly exposed to dangerous marine plastic pollution outside of the national jurisdiction of the coastal nations they breed in, according to international researchers who say countries need to work together to tackle plastic pollution in the high seas. Many seabirds, especially some that are already considered threatened species, are at high risk of accidentally ingesting plastic pollution, so researchers compared marine plastic density estimates across the world's oceans with tracking data across 77 petrel species. The researchers say they have identified high exposure risk areas in the Mediterranean and Black seas, as well as in the high seas and off the coast of the USA, Japan, and the UK.

Media release

From: Springer Nature

Ecology: Threatened oceanic seabirds may be at high risk of plastic exposure *IMAGES & VIDEOS*  

Areas around the world that represent a high risk of marine plastic exposure for oceanic seabirds called petrels are identified in a study published in Nature Communications. High exposure risk areas were identified in the Mediterranean and Black seas, as well as in the high seas and Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) of the USA, Japan, and the UK. The findings highlight the need for improved international cooperation and collaboration to address the global threat of plastic pollution.

Many seabird species are particularly sensitive to plastic pollution as they often ingest plastic or become entangled in it when foraging. Oceanic seabirds such as petrels, which cover vast distances during foraging and migration, are at higher risk as they retain plastic for longer periods owing to the structure of their digestive tract. Many petrel species are also considered threatened and likely to be vulnerable to plastic hazards. Given the rise in marine plastic pollution and its patchy distribution around the world, understanding where seabirds encounter and are at risk from plastic is crucial for informing mitigation and conservation actions.

To investigate the overlap between petrels and ocean plastics, Bethany Clark and colleagues quantified the plastic exposure risk for 77 petrel species — including shearwaters, fulmars, and prions — at a global scale. They examined the overlap in space and time between marine plastic density estimates and individual tracking data from over 7,000 birds. The authors compared exposure risks across populations, seasons, and jurisdictions, including the high seas areas outside of EEZs that are beyond the national jurisdiction of coastal nations. They found that threatened species — such as Balearic shearwater, Newell’s shearwater, and Hawaiian petrels — have greater exposure risk. This is particularly concerning for species that already have a higher risk of extinction due to other threats, such as invasive species, fisheries and climate change. The authors found that exposure risk primarily occurred outside the EEZs where the birds breed, and so only mitigating plastic pollution within EEZs would not adequately protect most species.

The authors argue that international collaboration is key to addressing the impacts of marine plastic on a wide variety of species.

Multimedia

Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract
Manx Shearwater
Manx Shearwater
White-faced storm petrel
White-faced storm petrel
White-faced storm petrel
White-faced storm petrel
Sooty shearwater
Sooty shearwater
Pink-footed shearwater
Pink-footed shearwater
Northern Fulmar
Northern Fulmar
Manx Shearwater
Manx Shearwater
Great Shearwater
Great Shearwater
Great Shearwater
Great Shearwater
Fairy prion
Fairy prion
Cook's Petrel
Cook's Petrel
Cape Petrel
Cape Petrel

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research Springer Nature, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Video Springer Nature, Web page Seabird plastics
Video Springer Nature, Web page
Journal/
conference:
Nature Communications
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: BirdLife International, UK
Funder: B.L.C., C.H., and A.M. were funded by the Cambridge Conservation Initiative’s Collaborative Fund sponsored by the Prince Albert II of Monaco Foundation. E.J.P. was supported by the Natural Environment Research Council C-CLEAR doctoral training programme (Grant no. NE/S007164/1).
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.