Marine conservation mitigates climate change

Publicly released:
International
Photo by Jeremy Bishop on Unsplash
Photo by Jeremy Bishop on Unsplash

Marine protected areas help preserve the plants and animals that live in them, but their contribution to climate change mitigation and adaptation has been less clear. Now an international team of researchers has analysed more than 22,000 publications spanning 241 protected areas, and found they boost carbon sequestration, as well as increasing biodiversity and providing greater food security. The mitigation and adaptation benefits of these protected areas were only achieved under full or high levels of protection, and the benefits increased the longer an area had been protected. The authors say that these findings show that marine protected areas are a key tool for achieving goals such as the United Nations Sustainable Development Agenda and the Paris Climate Agreement.

Media release

From: Cell Press

Marine protected areas act as a safeguard for oceans, seas, and estuaries. These zones help to preserve the plants and animals that call these waters home, but the benefits of protected areas extend far beyond their boundaries. In a review publishing October 21 in the journal One Earth, a team of researchers explain how marine protected areas help to sequester carbon and foster ecological and social adaption to climate change.

“Marine protected areas are increasingly being promoted as an ocean-based climate solution. Yet such claims remain controversial due to the diffuse and poorly synthesized literature on climate benefits of marine protected areas,” write the authors. “To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a systematic literature review of 22,403 publications spanning 241 marine protected areas.”

The authors found that carbon sequestration in marine protected areas increased significantly in seagrass areas, mangroves, and in areas where sediment wasn’t trawled. “Partial or full degradation of mangroves and seagrass both resulted in similar decreases of sequestered carbon, indicating that even low levels of human impact result in important carbon emissions,” they write.

In addition to boosting carbon sequestration, preserved areas were more biodiverse, had increased species richness, and showed benefits for humans, too. Marine protected areas had greater food security, and fish stocks in waters adjacent to these protected areas swelled. The authors note that the mitigation and adaptation benefits of these protected areas were only achieved under high levels of protection, and that benefits increased the longer an area had been protected.

“Across all four pathways analyzed, only full and high levels of protection resulted in mitigation or adaptation benefits,” they write. “In contrast, low levels of protection generated no benefits. Furthermore, increases in species richness and in fishers’ income only occurred for fully protected areas, where no fishing is allowed.”

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research Cell Press, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo ends.
Journal/
conference:
One Earth
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: PSL Universite Paris
Funder: Support for this study was provided by Pew Bertarelli Ocean Legacy. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Pew Bertarelli Ocean Legacy.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.