As they search for pollen, honeybees also collect the secrets of their cities

Publicly released:
Australia; International; NSW; VIC
Photo by Delia Giandeini on Unsplash
Photo by Delia Giandeini on Unsplash

Hidden in urban honeybee hives are secrets about the makeup of the cities the bees travel around, according to international researchers who looked at the potential of bees to record data about the microorganisms that occur in cities around the world, including Sydney and Melbourne. The team says they found each city has a unique genetic signature, with Melbourne full of eucalyptus DNA and Sydney home to plenty of bacteria that degrades rubber. The researchers say their method could one day help measure the health of both the bees themselves and their surroundings.

News release

From: Springer Nature

Honeybees provide a snapshot of city landscape and health

Urban honeybees could be used to gain insight into the microbiome of the cities in which they forage, which can potentially provide information on both hive and human health, reports a study published in Environmental Microbiome.

Cities are built for human habitation but are also spaces that host a wide range of living species, and understanding this diverse landscape is important for urban planning and human health. However, sampling the microbial landscape in a manner to cover wide areas of a city can be labour-intensive.

Elizabeth Hénaff and colleagues investigated the potential of honeybees (Apis Mellifera) to help gather samples of microorganisms across cities, as honeybees are known to forage daily up to one mile from their hives in urban environments. They sampled various materials from three hives in New York as part of a pilot study, and found diverse genetic information, including from environmental bacteria, in the debris accumulated at the bottom of the hives. Subsequent samples of hive debris in Sydney and Melbourne (Australia), Venice (Italy), and Tokyo (Japan) suggest that each location has a unique genetic signature as seen by honeybees.

In Venice, the genetic data was dominated by fungi related to wood rot and date palm DNA. In Melbourne, the sample was dominated by Eucalyptus DNA, whilst the sample from Sydney showed little plant DNA but contained genetic data from a bacteria species that degrades rubber (Gordonia polyisoprenivorans). Tokyo samples included plant DNA from Lotus and wild soybean, as well as the soy sauce fermenting yeast Zygosaccharomyces rouxii. Additionally, the authors compiled genetic material from the hive debris for Rickettsia felis (‘cat scratch fever’), a pathogen that is spread to humans via cat scratches. These findings indicate the potential of this as a surveillance method but are currently too preliminary to suggest that this is an effective method of monitoring human diseases.

The hive debris also contained bee-related microorganisms, likely coming from honeybee parts present in the debris. Based on 33 samples from the hives across the subsequent four cities, the authors found known bee microorganisms, whose presence indicate a healthy hive, and in some hives bee pathogens were detected, such as Paenibacillus larvaeMelissococcus plutonius, or the parasite Varroa destructor. The authors suggest these findings indicate that debris may additionally be used to assess the overall health of the hives.

The authors conclude that honeybee hive debris collected by honeybees provides a snapshot of the microbial landscape of urban environments and could be used alongside other measures to assess the microbial diversity and health of cities and honeybees in turn.

**Please note that an online press briefing for the paper below will take place UNDER STRICT EMBARGO on Tuesday 28th March at 1500 London time (BST) / 1000 US Eastern Time**

Elizabeth Hénaff and Kevin Slavin will discuss the research. This will be followed by a Q&A session.

You can register to attend the briefing here.

Multimedia

Collected material in preparation for DNA extraction at The Cooper Union
Collected material in preparation for DNA extraction at The Cooper Union
Beekeeper Tim O’Neal inspecting a frame from a Langstroth hive in Fort Greene
Beekeeper Tim O’Neal inspecting a frame from a Langstroth hive in Fort Greene
Inside view of a Langstroth hive in on beekeeper Ralph Gaeta’s rooftop
Inside view of a Langstroth hive in on beekeeper Ralph Gaeta’s rooftop
Study co-author Devora Najjar collecting a sample at a hive in, Fort Greene
Study co-author Devora Najjar collecting a sample at a hive in, Fort Greene
Langstroth hives kept by beekeeper Tim O’Neal in Fort Greene, Brooklyn, New York
Langstroth hives kept by beekeeper Tim O’Neal in Fort Greene, Brooklyn, New York
Rooftop hives kept by beekeeper Tim O’Neal in Fort Greene, Brooklyn, New York.
Rooftop hives kept by beekeeper Tim O’Neal in Fort Greene, Brooklyn, New York.
Local beekeeper Ralph Gaeta’s rooftop hives in Astoria, Queens, New York.
Local beekeeper Ralph Gaeta’s rooftop hives in Astoria, Queens, New York.
Top bar hives (right) and langstroth hives (left)
Top bar hives (right) and langstroth hives (left)
Study co-author Devora Najjar near local beekeeper Ralph Gaeta’s rooftop hives
Study co-author Devora Najjar near local beekeeper Ralph Gaeta’s rooftop hives

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research Springer Nature, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Journal/
conference:
Environmental Microbiome
Organisation/s: New York University, USA
Funder: The authors would like to acknowledge the Mori Building Company for their financial support, and Jun Fujiwara especially for his continued interest in the project. CEM would like to thank the Epigenomics Core Facility, the Vallee Foundation, Igor Tulchinsky and the WorldQuant Foundation, the National Institutes of Health (1R01MH117406), the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1151054), the NSF (1840275), and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (G-2015–13964).
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.