Would an artificial sweetener by any other name taste as sweet?

Publicly released:
Australia; International; WA
CC-0
CC-0

If we expect a drink to contain sugar, we enjoy it more, even if it actually contains just artificial sweeteners, according to international scientists, including an Australian. The team set out to see if 99 people would enjoy artificially sweetened drinks more if they expected them to contain sugar, and found that they did, with the sham beverages triggering activity in a brain area linked to reward. Conversely, when people were expecting an artificially sweetened drink but were sneakily given a sugary one, they enjoyed the sugary drink less. The findings highlight how expectations shape enjoyment and brain activity, even when those expectations are false, the researchers say. For people struggling to eat healthily, using positive terms like ‘nutrient-rich’ or 'minimal added sugars' rather than negative terms like ‘diet’ or ‘low calorie' on packaging could potentially create positive expectations that allow people, and their brains, to enjoy healthier foods, the authors conclude.

News release

From: Society for Neuroscience

How expectations about artificial sweeteners may affect their taste

When people expect that a beverage contains sugar, this expectation increases their enjoyment of beverages that only contain artificial sweeteners.
Elena Mainetto, from Radboud University, Margaret Westwater, from the University of Oxford, and colleagues at the University of Cambridge explored whether they could change how much people enjoy beverages containing sugar or artificial sweeteners by manipulating previous expectations about the drinks.

The researchers screened 99 healthy adults averaging 24 years of age, selecting those with similar perceptions of sugar and artificial sweeteners. Participants largely reported liking artificial sweeteners as much as they liked sugar, but, notably, the researchers found that they could alter beverage pleasantness by manipulating people’s expectations. When participants falsely believed they were drinking a beverage containing artificial sweeteners, they enjoyed sugar-containing drinks less. Conversely, when people falsely expected drinks to contain sugar, this expectation increased their enjoyment of artificial sweeteners, which coincided with increased activation of a brain area related to reward. Says Westwater, “This could mean that this brain area, the dopaminergic midbrain, processes increased nutrients or calories of sweet flavors, which supports rodent work showing that this brain region is important for sugar seeking.”  

According to the researchers, this work emphasizes the importance of expectancy in both behavioral and neural correlates to sweetness processing. Westwater elaborates on potential implications for dietary interventions, saying, “If we emphasize that healthier food alternatives are ‘nutrient rich,’ or have ‘minimal added sugars,’ this may create more positive expectations than using terms like ‘diet’ or ‘low calories.’ This may help people align their food choices with the brain’s preference for calories while supporting behavior change.” While Westwater acknowledges that this information isn’t new in a clinical sense, she hopes that the findings of this study shape how neuroscientific researchers look at diet and eating habits.

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research Society for Neuroscience, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Journal/
conference:
JNeurosci
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: University of Cambridge, UK, University of Oxford, UK
Funder: This work was supported by funding from the Bernard Wolfe Health Neuroscience Fund to 588 P.C.F. and H.Z. and a Wellcome Trust Investigator Award to P.C.F. (Reference No. 589 206368/Z/17/Z). MLW is supported by a Wellcome Trust Sir Henry Wellcome Postdoctoral 590 Fellowship (224107/Z/21/Z). KMJD is supported by an Academy of Medical Sciences 591 Springboard Award (SBF007\100058). All research at the Department of Psychiatry in the 592 University of Cambridge is supported by the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre 593 (NIHR203312) and the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East of England. The views 594 expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department 595 of Health and Social Care.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.