Photo by Kevin Kandlbinder on Unsplash
Photo by Kevin Kandlbinder on Unsplash

Some parts of your body may be aging faster than others

Embargoed until: Publicly released:
Peer-reviewed: This work was reviewed and scrutinised by relevant independent experts.

Observational study: A study in which the subject is observed to see if there is a relationship between two or more things (eg: the consumption of diet drinks and obesity). Observational studies cannot prove that one thing causes another, only that they are linked.

People: This is a study based on research using people.

Different organs within the human body may age at different paces depending on lifestyle, according to international researchers. The team used blood, poo, images and fitness tests results of 4000 people to try and estimate the biological age of hundreds of different aspects of the human body and how it changes. They say different organs aged at different paces depending partly on lifestyle, with some surprising impacts. For example, having diverse gut microbiota may make your gut biologically younger but it also appears to age your kidneys faster, suggesting genetic and lifestyle factors can help one part of the body while hindering another.

Journal/conference: Cell Reports

Link to research (DOI): 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110459

Organisation/s: BGI-Shenzhen, China

Funder: This research was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China, the National Natural Science Foundation of China, the Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality, and the Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality

Media release

From: Cell Press

Peer-reviewed            Observational study            People

Study finds distinct biological ages across individuals’ various organs and systems

It’s common to say that someone looks either younger or older than their chronological age, but aging is more than skin deep. Our various organs and systems may have different ages, at least from a biological perspective. In a study published March 8 in the journal Cell Reports, an international team of investigators used biomarkers, statistical modeling, and other techniques to develop tools for measuring the biological ages of various organ systems. Based on their findings, the researchers report that there are multiple “clocks” within the body that vary widely based on factors including genetics and lifestyle in each individual.

“Our study used approaches that can help improve our understanding of aging and—more importantly—could be used some day in real healthcare practice,” says co-corresponding author Xun Xu of the Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI) and China National GeneBank (CNGB) in Shenzhen, China. “We used biomarkers that could be identified from blood and stool samples plus some measurements from a routine body checkup.”

The concept of evaluating people’s biological aging rates has been around since the 1970s, but earlier studies were focused either on developing methods for estimating one centralized aging index or studying the molecular aging biomarkers using tissues and cell cultures outside the body.

“There has been a lack of practical applications in a population-based sample for precisely estimating the aging rates of live people’s organs and systems,” says co-corresponding author Xiuqing Zhang, also of BGI and CNGB. “So we decided to design one.”

To do this research, the investigators recruited 4,066 volunteers living in the Shenzhen area to supply blood and stool samples and facial skin images and to undergo physical fitness examinations. The volunteers were between the ages of 20 and 45 years; 52% were female and 48% were male. “Most human aging studies have been conducted on older populations and in cohorts with a high incidence of chronic diseases,” says co-corresponding author Brian Kennedy of the National University of Singapore. “Because the aging process in young healthy adults is largely unknown and some studies have suggested that age-related changes could be detected in people as young as their 20s, we decided to focus on this age range.”

In total, 403 features were measured, including 74 metabolomic features, 34 clinical biochemistry features, 36 immune repertoire features, 15 body composition features, 8 physical fitness features, 10 electroencephalography features, 16 facial skin features, and 210 gut microbiome features. These features were then classified into nine categories, including cardiovascular-related, renal-related, liver-related, sex hormone, facial skin, nutrition/metabolism, immune-related, physical fitness-related, and gut microbiome features.

Because of the difference in sex-specific effects, the groups were divided into male and female. The investigators then developed an aging-rate index that could be used to correlate different bodily systems with each other. Based on their findings, they classified the volunteers either as aging faster or aging slower than their chronological age.

Overall, they discovered that biological ages of different organs and systems had diverse correlations, and not all were expected. Although healthy weight and high physical fitness levels were expected to have a positive impact, the investigators were surprised by other findings. For example, having a more diverse gut microbiota indicated a younger gut while at the same time having a negative impact on the aging of the kidneys, possibly because the diversity of species causes the kidneys to do more work.

The investigators also used their approach to look at other datasets, including the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey, which includes data on more than 2,000 centenarians with matched middle-aged controls. In addition, they looked at single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to determine whether differences could be explained by genetic factors. There, they did find certain pathways that could be associated with aging rates.

The researchers plan to regularly follow up with the study participants to track the development of aging and validate their findings. Future studies will use additional approaches for classifying features of aging and studying the interactions between organ systems.

They also plan to use single-cell technology to look at programmed aging in more detail. “It’s important to capture the cell-to-cell variation in an aging individual, as this will tell us important information about the heterogeneity within cell types and tissues and provide important insights into aging mechanisms,” says co-corresponding author Claudio Franceschi of Lobachevsky State University in Russia.

Attachments:

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public

  • Cell Press
    Web page
    The URL will go live after the embargo ends

News for:

International

Multimedia:

  • Graphical Abstract
    Graphical Abstract

    This graphical abstract depicts the findings of Nie Li and Li et al who estimate biological ages of organs and systems using 402 multiomics features from 4066 individuals

    File size: 44.1 KB

    Attribution: Nie Li and Li et al

    Permission category: © - Only use with this story

    Last modified: 09 Mar 2022 3:21am

    NOTE: High resolution files can only be downloaded here by registered journalists who are logged in.

Show less
Show more

Media contact details for this story are only visible to registered journalists.