News release
From:
An intranasal prophylactic antibody for the flu shows promise in phase 1 trials
Researchers have designed a prophylactic antibody that’s delivered intranasally and can protect against various strains of the flu, according to new experiments involving mice and nonhuman primates, as well as two phase one clinical trials. The studies also showed that the antibodies were safe, suggesting they could eventually offer a more effective alternative to systemic antibodies that don’t directly target mucosal sites. Despite the development of flu vaccines, seasonal influenza still accounts for as many as 646,000 deaths each year. Furthermore, new strains are constantly emerging, and some of these strains could pose a pandemic health threat. There is a dire need for different types of prophylactics that can protect people against influenza, including antibody therapies. However, most monoclonal antibodies are injected systemically and don’t elicit large amounts of antibodies in mucosal areas such as the nose, where the virus first invades. Now, Anna Beukenhorst and colleagues report on the safety and preliminary efficacy of CR9114, an anti-influenza antibody that can be delivered via the nose. The antibody was safe and well-tolerated in mice and nonhuman primates. The team also tested various doses and dosing schedules, showing that CR9114 provided the best protection against both influenza A and B when given twice a day. The antibody was also safe in two phase one clinical trials involving a total of 143 volunteers, who displayed evidence of antibody accumulation in the nose. Furthermore, antibodies isolated from the noses of treated volunteers could bind to influenza A and B in culture, supporting their neutralizing potential. Beukenhorst et al. note that intranasal antibody formulations offer several advantages over systemic antibodies, since they can be self-administered via nasal sprays and are quicker to roll out during the early stages of outbreaks.
Expert Reaction
These comments have been collated by the Science Media Centre to provide a variety of expert perspectives on this issue. Feel free to use these quotes in your stories. Views expressed are the personal opinions of the experts named. They do not represent the views of the SMC or any other organisation unless specifically stated.
Dr Isabelle Montgomerie, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Malaghan Institute of Medical Research
"Most vaccines work by training your immune system to make its own antibodies over time. Passive immunisation is different - it involves giving ready-made antibodies directly for rapid protection.
"In this study, Beukenhorst and colleagues tested delivering an influenza antibody in a nasal spray. This matters because influenza usually infects people through the nose and upper airways, however passive immunisation normally involves delivering an antibody intravenously. Their phase 1 clinical trials showed that spraying the antibody into the nose was safe and well tolerated in humans. Animal studies in mice and monkeys also showed this approach could protect against influenza infection.
"A major advantage of nasal delivery is that it produces high antibody levels right where the virus enters, using much smaller doses than intravenous antibody treatments. However, the antibody cleared quickly from the nasal surface, lasting only a few hours, so it needed to be given twice daily. This means it would not replace vaccination, but it could provide short-term protection during a pandemic, especially for high-risk groups like healthcare workers.
"This study closely aligns with research currently under way in New Zealand at the Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, where we are developing influenza antibody therapies using mRNA technology and working with chemists at the Ferrier Research Institute to facilitate delivery directly to the nasal passage, with the aim of producing more affordable and longer-lasting protection."