IVF docs overestimating their knowledge and abilities can lead to hype in reproductive medicine

Publicly released:
Australia; VIC
Image by Elena Έλενα Kontogianni Κοντογιάννη from Pixabay
Image by Elena Έλενα Kontogianni Κοντογιάννη from Pixabay

In vitro fertilisation (IVF) doctors overestimating their knowledge and abilities, known as the Dunning-Kruger effect, can produce a cycle of hype about new treatments in reproductive medicine, which can result in harm to patients, say Australian experts. The experts use the example of a fertility treatment called endometrial scratch, which, despite limited evidence of its usefulness, was rapidly embraced to the point where 83% of clinics in some countries either offered or recommended the process, something the authors say is the “peak of inflated expectations” or “Mount Stupid”.   The authors say that there must be a concerted effort by regulators to classify reproductive treatments, interventions and 'add-ons' as being either: effective (proven safety and effectiveness); innovative (presumed safety but unproven effectiveness); or experimental (unproven safety and unproven effectiveness).

Multimedia

Schematic illustration of the “classic” Gartner Hype Cycle
Schematic illustration of the “classic” Gartner Hype Cycle
Schematic illustration of the Dunning-Kruger effect over time
Schematic illustration of the Dunning-Kruger effect over time

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research Elsevier, Web page Please link to the article in online versions of your report
Journal/
conference:
Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: The University of Melbourne, Murdoch Children's Research Institute (MCRI)
Funder: This project received no outside funding.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.