Global push to close critical gaps in women’s heart attack care

Publicly released:
Australia; NSW

The American Heart Association has released new global guidance led by Australian cardiologist Professor Jason Kovacic, revealing premenopausal women are being routinely misdiagnosed and undertreated for heart attacks with outcomes significantly worse than men their age. The statement outlines urgent gaps in diagnosis, clinical guidelines and research, including under-recognised causes like SCAD and MINOCA, which together account for a large share of heart attacks in women under 50. It also highlights how atypical symptoms and outdated assumptions continue to delay care for younger women.

News release

From: Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute (VCCRI)

Global Push to Close Critical Gaps in Women’s Heart Attack CareExperts call for better awareness, diagnosis, and research to save lives

A major global review has revealed critical gaps in how heart attacks in women are diagnosed and treated – particularly for premenopausal women. The American Heart Association (AHA) today released a new scientific statement led by Australian cardiologist Professor Jason Kovacic, warning current clinical practices may be costing women their lives.1

Despite heart disease being the leading cause of death overall and the second in Australia, experts reveal premenopausal women (typically women aged under about 50) who experience acute coronary syndromes (ACS) including heart attacks can be misdiagnosed or undertreated because they don’t fit the traditional risk profile.1-3 Studies show these women face significantly worse outcomes, including a higher likelihood of death or complications, compared to men of the same age.4

Professor Jason Kovacic, Director and CEO of the Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute said, “Too many women are missing out on timely diagnosis and treatment for heart attacks because the system isn’t designed to properly recognise these patients. We need urgent action to close these gaps.”

The AHA statement outlines several key priorities to close these critical care gaps:1

  • Increased awareness of how heart attacks can present in women
  • More representation of women in research and clinical trials to address poor outcomes.
  • Faster, more accurate diagnosis for premenopausal women

Current clinical guidelines are typically lacking in detail related to the various causes of heart attacks in premenopausal women, particularly non‑atherosclerotic causes.¹ This refers to cases that aren’t driven by the usual risk factors such as high cholesterol, high blood pressure, or fatty plaque buildup, which can lead to missed or delayed diagnosis and suboptimal care pathways.5

Two key examples are:

  • Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD): A tear in the coronary artery which is the leading cause of heart attacks in women under 50, accounting for approximately 25% of cases.6
  • Myocardial infarction with noobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): A heart without major blockages showing on scans.7

Although these conditions are recognised as major contributors to heart attacks in younger women, they remain under‑represented in existing clinical guidance – in part due to a lack of scientific evidence as to how best to manage these conditions.1 As a result, and because they are somewhat less common conditions, women are less likely to receive an accurate diagnosis and therapy after presenting with ACS, contributing to poorer outcomes compared with men the same age.4,8

“We often see heart attacks in premenopausal women that don’t look like the classic picture doctors expect. We need better recognition and more clinical research focused on women to ensure these different presentations are understood and incorporated into guidelines, so that every woman gets the correct diagnosis and optimal treatment,” said Professor Jason Kovacic.

Delays in care can often stem from low recognition of women’s heart attack symptoms both by women themselves and in emergency settings. While chest pain is the most common sign, women may experience subtler symptoms such as jaw or back pain, nausea, sweating, fatigue, or simply feeling “not right.” 9-11 These atypical signs are easily missed at home and during triage, making greater symptom awareness and improved emergency pathways critical to closing care gaps.1

The statement also calls for stronger follow-up care to address common secondary risk factors as well as issues linked to pregnancy.1 It recommends cardiac rehabilitation programs as these are proven to help recovery and improve long-term health. The statement also highlights mental health support, particularly for depression and anxiety after a heart attack, as an essential part of care.12-14

“This AHA scientific statement is an urgent call to action to drive further research and to address the poorer outcomes that are often seen in these young women. We know the gaps, and now we need to close them. Heart disease does not have an age limit, and premenopausal women deserve the same urgency and quality of care as any other patient with a suspected heart attack,” said Professor Jason Kovacic.

–  ENDS –

About Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute

The Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute is dedicated to finding cures for cardiovascular disease through world-class and cutting-edge medical research. The Institute's team seeks to discover better ways of understanding, diagnosing, treating, and preventing the onset of heart disease. It is committed to ensuring its research breakthroughs are rapidly translated into advances in clinical care.

The Institute has more than 250 scientists, doctors, and staff working together across 26 laboratories nationwide. It is renowned for the quality of its scientific discoveries worldwide.

References

  1. AHA Global Statement.
  2. World Health Organization. Cardiovascular Diseases (CVDs) – Fact Sheet. WHO; Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds).
  3. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Causes of Death, Australia – Latest Release. ABS; released 2024. Available from: https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/causes-death/causes-death-australia/latest-release
  4. Ricci B, Cenko E, Vasiljevic Z, Stankovic G, Kedev S, Kalpak O, Vavlukis M, Zdravkovic M, Hinic S, Milicic D, et al. Acute Coronary Syndrome: The Risk to Young Women. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2017;6. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007519
  5. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Atherosclerosis – Causes. National Institutes of Health; last updated March 24, 2022. Available from: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/atherosclerosis/causes
  6. Hayes SN, Kim ESH, Saw J, Adlam D, Arslanian-Engoren C, Economy KE, Ganesh SK, Gulati R, Lindsay ME, Mieres JH, et al. Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Current State of the Science: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;137: e523-e557. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000564.
  7. Yildiz M, Ashokprabhu N, Shewale A, Pico M, Henry TD, Quesada O, Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). Front Cardiovas Med. 2022;9:1032436. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2022.1032436.
  8. Arora S, Stouff GA, Kucharska-Newton AM, Qamar A, Vaduganathan M, Pandey A, Porterfield D, Blankstein R, Rosamond WD, Bhatt DL, Caughey MC. Twenty Year Trends and Sex Differences in Young Adults Hospitalized With Acute Myocardial Infarction. Circulation. 2019;139:1047-1056. Doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037137.
  9. Brush JE Jr., Krumholz HM, Greene EJ, Dreyer RP.  Sex Differences in Symptom Phenotypes Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 2020;13:e005948. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005948.
  10. Lichtman JH, Leifheit EC, Safdar B, Bao H, Krumholz HM, Lorenze NP, Daneshvar M, Spertus JA, D’Onofrio G. Sex Differences in the Presentation and Perception of Symptoms Among Young Patients With Myocardial Infarction: Evidence from the VIRGO Study (Variation in Recovery: Role of Gender on Outcomes of Young AMI Patients). Circulation. 2018;137:781-790. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031650.
  11. Lichtman JH, Leifheit-Limson EC, Watanabe E, Allen NB, Garavalia B, Garavalia LS, Spertus JA, Krumholz HM, Curry LA. Symptom recognition and healthcare experiences of young women with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 2015;8:S31-S38. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001612.
  12. Jha MK, Qamar A, Vaduganathan M, Charney DS, Murrough JW. Screening and Management of Depression in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:1827-1845. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.041
  13. Levine GN, Cohen BE, Commodore-Mensah Y, Fleury J, Huffman JC, Khalid U, Labarthe DR, Lavretsky H, Michos ED, Spatz ES, Kubzansky LD. Psychological Health, Well-Being, and the Mind-Heart-Body Connection: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021;143:e763-e783. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000947
  14. Rossi A, Mikail N, Bengs S, Haider A, Treyer V, Buechel RR, Wegener S, Rauen K, Tawakol A, Bairey Merz CN, et al. Heart-brain interactions in cardiac and brain diseases: why sex matters. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:3971-3980. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac061
Journal/
conference:
Circulation
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute (VCCRI)
Funder: N/A
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.