credit: Acropora
credit: Acropora

EXPERT REACTION: UNESCO report - Impacts of Climate Change on World Heritage Coral Reefs

Embargoed until: Publicly released:
UNESCO has released its first report into first global scientific assessment of the impacts of climate change on World Heritage Area (WHA) coral reefs. The report finds that unless CO2 emissions are reduced, by the end of the century, all reef-containing World Heritage properties will experience annual severe bleaching, and will cease to host functioning coral reef ecosystems. The report also states that for the first time, a ubiquitous global threat - heat stress sufficient to cause frequent severe bleaching and mortality - now threatens the Outstanding Universal Value of World Heritage sites in a way that cannot be resolved through local management alone. They say that protecting World Heritage reefs requires complementary national and global efforts to limit warming to 1.5°c

Organisation/s: ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, Macquarie University, UNESCO

Media Release

Assessment: World Heritage coral reefs likely to disappear by 2100 unless CO2 emissions drastically reduce

Today, UNESCO’s World Heritage Centre released the first global scientific assessment of climate change impacts on World Heritage coral reefs. Soaring ocean temperatures in the past three years have subjected 21 of 29 World Heritage reefs to severe and/or repeated heat stress, and caused some of the worst bleaching ever observed at iconic sites like the Great Barrier Reef (Australia), Papahānaumokuākea (USA), the Lagoons of New Caledonia (France) and Aldabra Atoll (Seychelles). The analysis predicts that all 29 coral-containing World Heritage sites would cease to exist as functioning coral reef ecosystems by the end of this century under a business-as-usual emissions scenario.

Bleaching is a stress response that causes coral animals to expel the microscopic algae (zooxanthellae) whose photosynthesis provides the energy needed to build three-dimensional reef structures. Mass bleaching is caused by rising water temperatures associated with climate change. It only takes a spike of 1-2°C to cause bleaching, and carbon emissions have caused a 1°C increase in global surface temperature since pre-industrial times. This effect has been magnified by strong El Niño and La Niña events. Ocean acidification caused by dissolved atmospheric CO2 weakens corals further.

“ The 29 globally significant coral reefs on UNESCO’s World Heritage List are facing existential threats, and their loss would be devastating ecologically and economically,” said Dr. Mechtild Rossler, Director of the World Heritage Centre. “These rainforests of the sea protect coastal communities from flooding and erosion, sustain fishing and tourism businesses, and host a stunning array of marine life.”

The social, cultural and economic value of coral reefs is estimated at US$1 trillion. Recent projections indicate that climate-related loss of reef ecosystem services will total US$500 billion per year or more by 2100, with the greatest impacts felt by people who rely on reefs for day-to-day subsistence.

Widespread coral bleaching was first documented in 1983, but the frequency and severity is increasing. The last three years were the hottest on record, and they caused a global bleaching event that reached 72% of World Heritage-listed reefs.

“We know the frequency and intensity of coral bleaching events will continue to increase as temperatures rise,” said Dr. Scott Heron, NOAA Coral Reef Watch and lead author of the assessment. “Our goal was to document climate impacts on World Heritage-listed coral reefs to date, and examine what the future may hold. The fate of these treasures matters to all humankind, and nations around the world are bound by the 1972 World Heritage Convention to support their survival.”

Coral communities typically take 15 to 25 years to recover from mass bleaching. The assessment looked at the frequency with which World Heritage reefs have been subjected to stress that exceeds best-case rates of recovery. It also examined future impacts to World Heritage reefs under two emissions scenarios. The results were sobering and concluded that delivering on the Paris Agreement target of “holding the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C” offers the only opportunity to prevent coral reef decline globally, and across all 29 reef-containing natural World Heritage sites.

The assessment was developed with satellite data from the United States National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Coral Reef Watch and received the support from the French Agency for Biodiversity (Agency Française pour la Biodiversité).

Attachments:

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public

Expert Reaction

These comments have been collated by the Science Media Centre to provide a variety of expert perspectives on this issue. Feel free to use these quotes in your stories. Views expressed are the personal opinions of the experts named. They do not represent the views of the SMC or any other organisation unless specifically stated.

Dr Elizabeth Madin is an Australian Research Council DECRA Fellow at Macquarie University.

This report’s findings should be alarming to anyone who depends or benefits in any way, directly or indirectly, from a coral reef World Heritage Area. This includes people in industries such as fisheries, and tourism, travellers, and recreational and subsistence fishers, to name just a few.

Importantly, though, government officials and policy makers in any of the countries fortunate enough to have coral reef World Heritage Areas – such as Australia and the US – should take particular note of the findings.

Without clear, aggressive, and globally coordinated steps that limit global mean temperatures to the Paris Agreement’s goal of 2°C above pre-industrial levels, this report shows that these valuable assets will continue to decline – likely reducing the many benefits their constituents derive from them.

It has been suggested that trading short-term profits for the long-term benefits that World Heritage Areas provide may be considered a dereliction of the state’s duty to act in the public interest. Many of us who have witnessed firsthand the rapid decline of the reefs we study are working to help policy makers understand the high stakes here - not just for nature, but for people. This report is an important step towards this goal. It is imperative that policymakers take heed

Last updated: 24 Jun 2017 11:04am
Professor Terry Hughes is Director of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies. He provided an analysis of bleaching records for the report

UNESCO has reached out to the coral reef science community to publish a report today on the Impacts of Climate Change on World Heritage Areas. There are 29 Word Heritage Areas with tropical reefs, four of them in Australia (The Great Barrier Reef, Lord Howe Island, Shark Bay and Ningaloo Reef).

The ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies contributed to the UNESCO report by compiling records of coral bleaching at each of the 29 locations. Twenty-one of them (72%) have experienced severe bleaching stress in the past three years, including the back-to-back bleaching on the Great Barrier Reef in 2016 and 2017.

The future of these iconic reefs will depend critically on the success or failure of the COP21 Paris Agreement on Climate Change. Business-as-usual greenhouse gas emissions will eventually destroy coral reefs. Climate projections by NOAA for the UNESCO report show that drastic reductions in emissions is the only way to save the world’s reefs. Local management of pressures such as pollution and overfishing is no longer sufficient to protect World Heritage reefs – global action is urgently required to curb global warming.

Last updated: 24 Jun 2017 10:59am

News for:

Australia

Media contact details for this story are only visible to registered journalists.