Eggs more likely to survive a drop on the side than top or bottom

Publicly released:
International
A cracked egg after a horizontal static test. Credit: Tal Cohen et al. / Scientific Reports
A cracked egg after a horizontal static test. Credit: Tal Cohen et al. / Scientific Reports

A smashed egg all over the counter is no yolk (sorry), but if you're lucky enough to drop your egg on its side rather than its top or bottom, it's much more likely to survive intact, according to international scientists. The team recreated a common classroom science experiment called the 'egg drop challenge', in which students have a crack at preventing an egg from smashing when dropped from a height. The researchers dropped 180 eggs from three different heights - 8, 9, and 10 millimetres - on to a hard surface. More than half of the eggs dropped vertically from 8mm cracked, while less than 10% of horizontally-dropped eggs cracked from the same height. They then looked at the forces required to crack eggs in different orientations, finding that sideways eggs can compress more before cracking. The findings suggest that the common belief that eggs are less likely to crack if dropped vertically is wrong, despite this assumption appearing in teaching advice and being repeated by 'popular science' communicators, the egg-sperts conclude.

Media release

From: Springer Nature

Eggs less likely to crack when dropped side-on

Eggs are less likely to crack when dropped on their side than when dropped vertically, finds research published in Communications Physics. Controlled trials simulating the ‘egg drop challenge’, a common classroom science experiment, found that the shell of an egg can better withstand an impact when dropped side-on.

The goal of the ‘egg drop challenge’ is for students to prevent an egg from cracking when dropped from a set height. A common belief is that an egg is stronger and less likely to crack when dropped vertically, with this assumption often seen in teaching guidance from schools and among ‘popular science’ communicators.

Tal Cohen and colleagues conducted a series of 180 drop tests to compare how chicken eggs break when orientated vertically or side-on. After dropping 60 eggs from each of three different heights — 8, 9, and 10 millimetres — on to a hard surface, the authors observed that, on average, eggs dropped vertically broke at lower drop heights. More than half of the eggs dropped vertically from 8 millimetres cracked, with which end of the egg pointed downwards making no difference. However, less than 10 percent of horizontally-dropped eggs cracked from the same height. A further 60 eggs were subjected to compression tests, which measured the force required to crack the eggs vertically and horizontally. While 45 newtons of force was required to break the eggs in both orientations, the horizontally-loaded eggs could compress further before cracking. The authors suggest that this means that eggs are more flexible around their equator, and therefore able to absorb more energy in this orientation before breaking.

The authors conclude that the reason behind the common misassumption that an egg dropped vertically is less likely to crack is a confusion between the physical properties stiffness, strength, and toughness. Eggs are stiffer when compressed vertically, but the authors say that this does not necessarily mean that eggs are also tougher in that direction. The authors also suggest that future research could explore the application of these findings to engineering scenarios, such as how structures respond to dynamic loads.

Multimedia

Measuring eggs before egg drop tests
Measuring eggs before egg drop tests
Some eggs from the experiment in front of the Great Dome at MIT
Some eggs from the experiment in front of the Great Dome at MIT
A cracked egg after a horizontal static test
A cracked egg after a horizontal static test
A cracked egg after a vertical static test
A cracked egg after a vertical static test

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research Springer Nature, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Journal/
conference:
Communications Physics
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
Funder: We acknowledge the partial support of our work through Office of Naval Research grant N000142312530 and the support fromthe National Science Foundation under award number CMMI1942016. S.K.N. acknowledges the MIT Postdoctoral Fellowship Programfor Engineering Excellence (PFPFEE). J.E.B. acknowledges the support of the NSF GFRP.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.