Photo by Adli Wahid on Unsplash
Photo by Adli Wahid on Unsplash

Economic and social rights in the Pacific can improve without income growth

Embargoed until: Publicly released:
Not peer-reviewed: This work has not been scrutinised by independent experts, or the story does not contain research data to review (for example an opinion piece). If you are reporting on research that has yet to go through peer-review (eg. conference abstracts and preprints) be aware that the findings can change during the peer review process.

A new Motu working paper has found that there are opportunities to improve economic and social rights across Pacific countries, even without income growth. The findings come from data that regularly monitor how well countries are meeting their human rights obligations. The data suggest there’s scope for countries to learn from each other. For example, countries scoring poorly on one metric can look at what policies well-performing countries have in place.

Organisation/s: Motu Economic and Public Policy Research Trust, University of Connecticut, USA

Funder: Ministry of Foreign Affairs & Trade – New Zealand Aid Programme

Media release

From: Motu Economic and Public Policy Research Trust

The Human Rights Measurement Initiative (HRMI) provides annual scores to show how well countries are meeting their human rights obligations and treating their people as well as they can.

This report looks at economic and social rights enjoyment in Pacific countries, i.e., to what extent are people able to enjoy their rights to education, food, health, housing, and work. It looks at ways of expanding the number of countries and rights HRMI can provide scores for, given gaps in the available data.

The scores show that there are opportunities to substantially improve economic and social right enjoyment in the Pacific, even without per capita income growth.

The range in economic and social right performance scores observed across the Pacific countries indicates there is considerable scope for countries to learn from each other about what approaches hold promise. Countries scoring poorly on one right can look to the policies and structures in place that other countries have used to achieve good scores on the same right.

In countries whose Gross National Income (GNI) substantially exceeds their Gross Domestic Product (GDP), HRMI’s economic and social rights scores are upward biased, all the more so, the greater the gap between GNI and GDP.  For those countries without Purchasing Power Parity (PPP$) per capita income data, the computation of a USD variant of HRMI’s economic and social rights metrics allows some insight (albeit imperfect) into their economic and social rights performance.

See more information about the Human Rights Measurement Initiative (HRMI).

Attachments:

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public

  • Motu Economic and Public Policy Research Trust
    Web page

News for:

New Zealand
Pacific
International

Media contact details for this story are only visible to registered journalists.