Science diplomacy needs to be more business-like, experts say

Publicly released:
New Zealand; International
Photo by Thomas Lohmann on Unsplash
Photo by Thomas Lohmann on Unsplash

A new editorial co-authored by former NZ Chief Science Advisor Sir Peter Gluckman argues that science diplomacy needs to become more "transactional", focused on shorter term national benefits. Although science diplomacy has been viewed optimistically in recent decades, the authors write, international politics caused this "aspirational" and trusting model to shift to a second "pragmatic" model focused on shared problem-solving. They explain that the third model, the new "transactional" one, has risks such as an increased focus on nationalism and prioritising quick rewards over fundamental science. However, they say it's a logical response to the way the world currently works, and doesn't need to mean losing scientific cooperation or trust—rather, future science diplomats should draw on all three models of diplomacy to combine their strengths.

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research AAAS, Web page
Research AAAS, Web page Paper is freely available online
Journal/
conference:
Science
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: Koi Tū: the Centre for Informed Futures, US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine; International Science Council
Funder: N/A
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.