Discovery challenges long-held beliefs on early human technology in East Asia

Publicly released:
Australia; International; QLD
Reconstruction of Xigou tool-making. (Credit Hulk Yuan)
Reconstruction of Xigou tool-making. (Credit Hulk Yuan)

A new study reveals ancient hominins in central China were far more inventive and adaptable than previously believed, at a time when multiple large-brained hominins were present, such as Homo longi and Homo juluensis, and possibly Homo sapiens.

News release

From: Griffith University

A newly excavated archaeological site in central China is reshaping long-held assumptions about early hominin behaviour in Eastern Asia.

Led by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, an international team of researchers conducted archaeological excavations at Xigou, located in the Danjiangkou Reservoir Region in central China, uncovering evidence of advanced stone tool technologies dating back 160,000-72,000 years ago.

The explorations, co-led by Griffith University, revealed hominins in this region were far more inventive and adaptable than previously believed, at a time when multiple large-brained hominins were present in China, such as Homo longi and Homo juluensis, and possibly Homo sapiens.

“Researchers have argued for decades that while hominins in Africa and western Europe demonstrated significant technological advances, those in East Asia relied on simpler and more conservative stone-tool traditions,” said expedition leader Dr Shixia Yang of the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology (IVPP).

Study co-author Professor Michael Petraglia, Director of Griffith University’s Australian Research Centre for Human Evolution, added: “The Xigou findings challenge the narrative that early humans in China were conservative over time.”

“Detailed analyses from the site show hominin inhabitants employed sophisticated stone toolmaking methods to produce small flakes and tools that were then used in a diverse array of activities.”

Among the most striking finds was the discovery of hafted stone-tools – the earliest-known evidence of composite tools in East Asia.

These tools combined stone components with handles or shafts, and demonstrated complex planning, skilled craftsmanship, and an understanding of how to enhance tool performance.

Lead author Dr Jian-Ping Yue of the IVPP said: “Their presence indicates the Xigou hominins possessed a high degree of behavioural flexibility and ingenuity.”

The site’s rich layers, covering a 90,000-year period, aligned with growing evidence of increasing hominin diversity in China.

Large-brained hominins identified at Xujiayao and Lingjing, sometimes referred to as Homo juluensis, provided a possible biological context for the behavioural complexity reflected in the Xigou assemblages.

“The technological strategies evident in the stone tools likely played a crucial role in helping hominin populations adapt to the fluctuating environments that characterised the 90,000-year-period in Eastern Asia,” Professor Petraglia said.

The research team said the Xigou findings reshaped our understanding of human evolution in East Asia, proving early populations possessed cognitive and technical abilities comparable to their counterparts in Africa and Europe.

Dr Yang added: “Emerging evidence from Xigou and other sites shows early technologies in China included prepared-core methods, innovative retouched tools, and even large cutting tools, pointing to a richer and more complex technological landscape than previously recognised.”

The study ‘Technological innovations and hafted technology in central China ~160,000–72,000 years ago’ has been published in Nature Communications.

Multimedia

Borer tools
Borer tools
Site excavation
Site excavation
Journal/
conference:
Nature Communications
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: Griffith University, The University of Queensland
Funder: Financial support was provided by the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (Grant No. 2024QZKK0301), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 42488201 and 42177424, 42522206; S.-X.Y. and C.-L.D.), the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (grants Y2022102 and 2020074; S.-G.K. and S.-X.Y.), Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi (2024JC-JCQN-37; S.-G.K.), the International Partnership Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant 052GJHZ2022024FN; S.-X.Y., M.P., and A.O.), the Beijing Natural Science Foundation of China (grant 8232048;Y.-X.Z.) Griffith University (S.- X.Y. and M.P.), the PID2024-156477NB-C31 project (A.O. and J-L.F-M.), the Generalitat de Catalunya AGAUR agency (2021SGR01239 Research Group; A.O. and J-L.F-M.), Universitat Rovira i Virgili (grant no. 2023PFRURV-01239; A.O. and J-L.F-M.), and an APOSTD contract of the Generalitat Valenciana-FSE (contract no. CIAPOS/2022/022; J-L.F-M.). The IPHES-CERCA has received financial support through the “María de Maeztu” program for Units of Excellence -CEX2024-01485-M/funded by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 (A.O. and J-L.F-M.)
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.