Device study in rats finds improvement for spinal cord injuries

Publicly released:
New Zealand; International
PHOTO: Chuttersnap/Unsplash
PHOTO: Chuttersnap/Unsplash

A new trial led by NZ and Swedish researchers aims to find an effective treatment for people with spinal cord injuries. The team developed an ultra-thin implant designed to sit directly on the spinal cord of rats, with the aim to stimulate healing. After four weeks, animals that received daily electric field treatment showed improved movement compared with those who did not. The team says that long term, the goal is to transform this technology into a medical device that could benefit people living with these life-changing spinal-cord injuries.

Media release

From: University of Auckland

Device study offers hopes for spinal cord injuries

Spinal cord injuries are currently incurable with devastating effects on people’s lives, but now a trial at Waipapa Taumata Rau, University of Auckland offers hope for an effective treatment.

Spinal cord injuries shatter the signal between the brain and body, often resulting in a loss of function.

“Unlike a cut on the skin, which typically heals on its own, the spinal cord does not regenerate effectively, making these injuries devastating and currently incurable,” says lead researcher Dr Bruce Harland, a senior research fellow in the School of Pharmacy at Waipapa Taumata Rau, University of Auckland.

Before birth, and to a lesser extent afterwards, naturally occurring electric fields play a vital role in early nervous system development, encouraging and guiding the growth of nerve tissue along the spinal cord.

Scientists are now harnessing this same electrical guidance system in the lab. An implantable electronic device has restored movement following spinal cord injury in an animal study, raising hopes for an effective treatment for humans and even their pets.

“We developed an ultra-thin implant designed to sit directly on the spinal cord, precisely positioned over the injury site in rats,” Dr Harland says.

The device delivers a carefully controlled electrical current across the injury site.

“The aim is to stimulate healing so people can recover functions lost through spinal-cord injury,” Professor Darren Svirskis, director of the CatWalk Cure Programme at the University’s School of Pharmacy says.

Unlike humans, rats have a greater capacity for spontaneous recovery after spinal cord injury, which allowed researchers to compare natural healing with healing supported by electrical stimulation.

After four weeks, animals that received daily electric field treatment showed improved movement compared with those who did not.

Throughout the 12-week study, they responded more quickly to gentle touch.

“This indicates that the treatment supported recovery of both movement and sensation,” Harland says.

“Just as importantly, our analysis confirmed that the treatment did not cause inflammation or other damage to the spinal cord, demonstrating that it was not only effective but also safe.”

This new study, published in a leading journal, has come out of a partnership between the University of Auckland and Chalmers University of Technology in Sweden. See Nature Communications.

“Long term, the goal is to transform this technology into a medical device that could benefit people living with these life-changing spinal-cord injuries,” says Professor Maria Asplund of Chalmers University of Technology.

“This study offers an exciting proof of concept showing that electric field treatment can support recovery after spinal cord injury,” says doctoral student Lukas Matter, also from Chalmers University.

The next step is to explore how different doses, including the strength, frequency, and duration of the treatment, affect recovery, to discover the most effective recipe for spinal-cord repair.

Read the study.
Find out about animal-based research at the University of Auckland.

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research Springer Nature, Web page
Journal/
conference:
Nature Communications
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: University of Auckland
Funder: This work was supported by funding from the CatWalk Spinal Cord Injury Trust and the Health Research Council of New Zealand (Cure Programme, HRC/Catwalk Partnership 19/895, and B.H. was supported by an HRC Sir Charles Hercus Research Fellowship (24/184/A). Funding was also received from the Neurological Foundation of New Zealand (Project Grant 1941). The authors would like to acknowledge Connor Clement (CC) who analysed the error ladder data. This work was performed in part at the Chalmers Material Analysis Laboratory, CMAL. Support for M.A and L.M. was further contributed by Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies (FRIAS) and the Chalmers Gender Initiative for Excellence (GENIE). This work was also supported by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs endorsed by the Department of Defense (US $534,258) through the Spinal Cord Injury Research Program (award HT9425-23-1-0492). Opinions, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are those of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Department of Defense.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.