Media release

From: Medical Journal of Australia (MJA)

Is social media really to blame for youth self harm?

Researchers question whether social media is the root cause of rising youth self harm, or a conveniently simple scapegoat for a complex problem.

As debate rages over the federal government’s proposed social media ban for young people, a new perspective published in the Medical Journal of Australia has examined the complex interplay between social media and youth mental health.

Although the potential harms of social media on adolescents cannot be ignored, the authors argue that a social media ban fails to consider the broader societal issues that contribute to mental illness and self-harm in young people.

The authors also note that a social media ban could isolate young people from mental health information and support, a concern echoed by Australia’s leading mental health organisations.

Self-harm links are unclear

Rising rates of self-harm in young people have coincided with the rise of smartphones, with much discussion on the relationship between the emergence of the “anxious generation” and the advent of social media.

“Technological innovations have historically influenced social norms and societal structures, so it is crucial to take these concerns seriously,” Professor Helen Christensen of the Australian National University and co-authors wrote.

“However, the argument that social media is the cause of rising trends in youth self-harm is relatively weak.”

The authors note that research has only shown a small association between the use of social media and depression, and the disproportionate rise in self-harm among young women compared to young men cannot be explained by the use of social media alone.

Looking at the wider context

The perspective authors argue that focusing solely on social media as the cause of youth mental health problems ignores the broader societal factors at play, such as global conflict, socio-economic hurdles, gendered violence and climate change — all issues that weigh heavily on young people.

The authors also note the potential harms of a social media ban for vulnerable young people who rely on social media for support and resources, such as gender minority youth and youth already experiencing mental illness.

“Complete bans could hinder health literacy development and help-seeking behaviours, especially among those at greater risk,” the authors wrote.

“Age-restrictions might push young people into using less regulated platforms, while also undermining the responsibility of existing platforms to create safe online communities.”

Further investigation is needed

The authors call for further research into the impact of social media on young people to better understand how it helps or harms young people’s mental health.

“As Australia introduces policies that restrict young people’s social media exposure, we must investigate the effect these policies have or do not have,” the authors wrote.

But the authors argue that a social media ban is unlikely to be the solution to the very complex problem of youth mental health.

“This would be akin to stopping the flow of toxic chemicals into a river while failing to shut down the factory that causes the pollution,” the authors wrote.

“In our efforts to understand the drivers of rising youth self-harm, social media cannot become a scapegoat for broader factors that drive mental health problems.”