BRIEFING ALERT: Robot babies increase pregnancy rates in teens

Embargoed until: Publicly released:

NEWS BRIEFING: Thursday 25 August 2016 at 10:30am AEST ONLINE Electronic baby dolls which are designed to simulate the 'real experience' of having an infant don't work to cut teen pregnancy rates, say Australian researchers. In fact, a landmark study has found that teenage girls who used the dolls as part of a pregnancy prevention programme were more, not less, likely to become pregnant.

Journal/conference: The Lancet

Organisation/s: Telethon Kids Institute

Lancet Release

Baby simulator programme may make teenage girls more, not less, likely to become pregnant

  • Similar programmes reportedly used in schools in 89 countries, including the USA
  • Authors of the randomised trial warn that the intervention is likely to be an ineffective use of public funds

A teenage pregnancy prevention programme involving a baby simulator does not appear to have any long-term effect on reducing the risk of teenage pregnancy, according to the first randomised controlled trial to test the effectiveness of this intervention, published in The Lancet today. In fact, the study found that teenage girls who took part were more, not less, likely to become pregnant compared to girls who did not take part. Similar programmes are reportedly delivered in 89 countries, and the authors of this Australian trial warn that the intervention is likely to be an ineffective use of public funds to prevent teenage pregnancy.The Virtual Infant Parenting (VIP) programme is an Australian adaptation of the US programme RealityWorks (often referred to as “Baby Think It Over”). Intended as a pregnancy prevention programme, the VIP programme is delivered in schools and includes educational sessions (eg, the impact of not smoking, drinking or taking drugs on a healthy pregnancy, good nutrition, the financial costs of having a baby, sexual health, contraception, and respectful relationships), a workbook, watching a video documentary of teenage mothers talking about their experiences, and caring for an infant simulator over the weekend. The infant simulator is a doll that cries when it needs to be fed, burped, rocked or changed and measures and reports on mishandling, crying time, the number of changes and general care.The use of infant simulator programmes is common in developed countries and their use is increasing in low and middle income countries. Despite this, there is no robust evidence of their effectiveness. While some studies have looked at the effect on girls’ intentions to get pregnant, or attitudes to pregnancy, no randomised trials have objectively measured the impact on pregnancy.

A total of 57 schools in Western Australia took part in the study. Schools were randomly allocated to receive either the VIP programme (1267 girls), which is delivered by school nurses over 6 consecutive days, or to receive the standard health education curriculum (1567 girls). The researchers then linked this information to data from hospital records and abortion clinics. All girls were aged 13-15 at the start of the study and they were followed until the age of 20.

Compared to girls in the control group, girls enrolled on the VIP programme had higher rates of pregnancy and abortion. 8% (97/1267) of the girls in the intervention group had at least one birth, compared to 4% (67/1567) in the control group. Similarly, 9% (113/1267) of girls in the intervention group had an abortion, compared to 6% (101/1567) in the control group (table 2).

“Our study shows that the pregnancy prevention programme delivered in Western Australia, which involves an infant simulator, does not reduce the risk of pregnancy in teenage girls. In fact, the risk of pregnancy is actually increased compared to girls who didn’t take part in the intervention” says lead author Dr Sally Brinkman, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Adelaide, Australia. “Similar programmes are increasingly being offered in schools around the world, and evidence now suggests they do not have the desired long-term effect of reducing teenage pregnancy. These interventions are likely to be an ineffective use of public resources for pregnancy prevention.”

*The authors say that the study included a large number of teenagers, but caution that the overall participation in the study was quite low (45% in the control schools and 58% in the intervention schools), so there is no information about the girls who chose not to enrol. However, they say that participation in this type of intervention is voluntary in Australia, so the girls who did take part are likely to be an accurate reflection of those who would normally do so (eg, outside a trial). They also note that girls in the control group had on average a higher socio economic status and educational attainment, but when the research team re-ran the analysis to take these factors into account, they found that this had no effect on the findings.

Writing in a linked Comment, Professor Julie A Quinlivan, University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle WA, Australia, discusses the possible reasons why the intervention does not work. She says: “The cure for teenage pregnancy is more difficult than a magic doll. We have to address both mothers and fathers. Programmes need to start in infancy. Investment in vulnerable children is needed to entice these adolescents from the path of premature parenthood into brighter futures. We cannot afford the quick fix, especially when it doesn’t work.”

NOTE TO EDITORS:

* Quote direct from author and cannot be found in text of Article.

Attachments:

  • The Lancet
    BabySim_PR_Lancet.doc, 40.0 KB
  • The Lancet
    Web page
    The URL will go live after the embargo ends.
  • Australian Science Media Centre
    Web page
    Media briefing playback

News for:

Australia
SA
WA

Multimedia:

  • Briefing video playback - MP4

    Briefing video playback - MP4

    File Size: 5.3 MB

    Attribution: AusSMC

    Permission Category: Free to share (must credit)

    Last Modified: 03 Nov 2016 8:31pm

    Note: High resolution video files are only available for download here by registered journalists who are logged in.

  • Dr Sally Brinkman with one of the virtual babies
    Dr Sally Brinkman with one of the virtual babies

    Dr Sally Brinkman with one of the virtual babies

    File size: 2.6 MB

    Attribution: Australian Science Media Centre

    Permission category: Free to share or modify (must credit)

    Last modified: 03 Nov 2016 4:36pm

    NOTE: High resolution files can only be downloaded here by registered journalists who are logged in.

  • Dr Sally Brinkman with one of the virtual babies
    Dr Sally Brinkman with one of the virtual babies

    Dr Sally Brinkman with one of the virtual babies

    File size: 2.4 MB

    Attribution: Australian Science Media Centre

    Permission category: Free to share or modify (must credit)

    Last modified: 03 Nov 2016 7:41pm

    NOTE: High resolution files can only be downloaded here by registered journalists who are logged in.

  • Dr Sally Brinkman with one of the virtual babies
    Dr Sally Brinkman with one of the virtual babies

    Dr Sally Brinkman with one of the virtual babies

    File size: 2.2 MB

    Attribution: Australian Science Media Centre

    Permission category: Free to share or modify (must credit)

    Last modified: 03 Nov 2016 4:19pm

    NOTE: High resolution files can only be downloaded here by registered journalists who are logged in.

  • A virtual baby identical to those used in the study
    A virtual baby identical to those used in the study

    A virtual baby identical to those used in the study

    File size: 1.9 MB

    Attribution: Australian Science Media Centre

    Permission category: Free to share or modify (must credit)

    Last modified: 03 Nov 2016 4:12pm

    NOTE: High resolution files can only be downloaded here by registered journalists who are logged in.

  • A virtual baby identical to those used in the study
    A virtual baby identical to those used in the study

    A virtual baby identical to those used in the study

    File size: 2.0 MB

    Attribution: Australian Science Media Centre

    Permission category: Free to share or modify (must credit)

    Last modified: 03 Nov 2016 7:33pm

    NOTE: High resolution files can only be downloaded here by registered journalists who are logged in.

  • Dr Sally Brinkman with one of the virtual babies
    Dr Sally Brinkman with one of the virtual babies

    Dr Sally Brinkman with one of the virtual babies

    File size: 2.2 MB

    Attribution: Australian Science Media Centre

    Permission category: Free to share or modify (must credit)

    Last modified: 03 Nov 2016 4:32pm

    NOTE: High resolution files can only be downloaded here by registered journalists who are logged in.

  • A virtual baby identical to those used in the study

    A virtual baby identical to those used in the study

    File Size: 14.8 MB

    Attribution: Australian Science Media Centre

    Permission Category: Free to share or modify (must credit)

    Last Modified: 03 Nov 2016 4:31pm

    Note: High resolution video files are only available for download here by registered journalists who are logged in.

  • A virtual baby identical to those used in the study

    A virtual baby identical to those used in the study

    File Size: 25.3 MB

    Attribution: Australian Science Media Centre

    Permission Category: Free to share or modify (must credit)

    Last Modified: 03 Nov 2016 6:32pm

    Note: High resolution video files are only available for download here by registered journalists who are logged in.

  • Raw interview footage with Dr Sally Brinkman

    Raw interview footage with Dr Sally Brinkman

    File Size: 76.9 MB

    Attribution: Australian Science Media Centre

    Permission Category: No right reserved (waive all rights)

    Last Modified: 03 Nov 2016 7:19pm

    Note: High resolution video files are only available for download here by registered journalists who are logged in.

Show less
Show more

Media contact details for this story are only visible to registered journalists.