There's been a mass exodus of environmentalists from the website formerly known as Twitter

Publicly released:
International
Photo by Brett Jordan on Unsplash
Photo by Brett Jordan on Unsplash

Nearly 50% of 'environmentally-oriented' people who were active on Twitter (or X) before Elon Musk took the company over are now either gone or barely using the site, according to international researchers. They studied a group of 380,000 users from the conservation community who usually used the site to discuss environmental issues including climate change and biodiversity. The researchers say with just 52.5% of that group still actively using the site, there is currently no equivalent platform to continue having those discussions at the same level. They say researchers need to take an active role in finding a solution so environmental outreach is not lost as users continue to mark Twitter with an X.

Media release

From: Cell Press

Peer-reviewed           Data/statistical analysis           People
Nearly 50% of environmentalists abandoned Twitter following Musk’s takeover

In October 2022, Elon Musk purchased Twitter (recently renamed X), which had previously served as the leading social media platform for environmental discourse. Since then, reports a team of researchers in the journal Trends in Ecology and Evolution on August 15, there has been a mass exodus of environmental users on the platform—a phenomenon that could have serious implications for public communication surrounding topics like biodiversity, climate change, and natural disaster recovery.

“Twitter has been the dominant social media platform for diverse environmental interests to communicate and organize around advocacy goals, exchange ideas and research, and new opportunities for collaboration,” writes the US-based research team of biologists and environmental consultants.

The team studied a group of 380,000 “environmentally-oriented users,” which included a wide range of people from the conservation community who had actively participated in pro-environmental discussions surrounding topics like climate change and biodiversity on Twitter. Users were considered “active” if they posted on the platform at least once within a 15-day period. The researchers found that in the 6-month period after Musk took over Twitter, only 52.5% of these environmental users were still actively using Twitter—a substantially larger drop-off rate than other “comparable online communities,” including users who discuss general politics on the platform.

“There is currently no platform equivalent to Twitter,” the team writes. “Thus, any changes in engagement by environmentally-minded users raises serious questions about where to track discourse about environmental conservation and how to mobilize pro-environmental segments of the public.”

Going forward, the authors call upon researchers to take an active role in the transition towards different modes of environmental communication—whether that be advocating for change within Twitter to help make it a useful platform for environmentalists again or collectively switching to another platform like Mastodon or Threads. They also point to resources like the Coalition for Independent Technology Research, which bring people together to voice concerns to Twitter representatives and policymakers.

“The future of Twitter as a platform for outreach and research is uncertain,” write the authors. “We need to create collaborations across industry, the non-profit sector, and academia to track public engagement with the environment across social media platforms for the benefit of primary research, applied environmental conservation, and climate mitigation.”

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research Cell Press, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Journal/
conference:
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: Pomona College, USA
Funder: No interests are declared.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.