Media release
From:
Study uses GPS to track teens’ activity
A New Zealand study using GPS devices to follow teenagers has found that those who spend more of their spare time in “healthy” areas are more likely to be physically active.
The University of Canterbury-led research measured where almost 200 high school students in Auckland and Wellington went over a two-week period by fitting the participants with a wearable global positioning system (GPS) device. This was combined with an accelerometer which measured their movement and activity patterns.
The results were combined with environmental data to find out what features the participants were near; such as green spaces (parks and recreation centres), dairies, conveniences stores or takeaway outlets. The study aimed to find out how spending time in different areas affected the teenagers’ levels of physical activity and sedentary time.
Lead researcher Dr Matthew Hobbs, a Senior Lecturer in the University of Canterbury (UC) Faculty of Health and Co-Director of the GeoHealth Laboratory, says a key finding is that the more time the adolescents spent in areas with access to health-promoting features, the less time they spent sedentary or travelling by car.
“We found the environment does seem to have an impact on adolescent behaviour, particularly their activity levels,” he says. “This is significant because we know that increased physical activity in adolescence is linked to higher academic achievement as well as more positive long-term health outcomes.”
The research was carried out in collaboration with Auckland University of Technology and has been published in the international journal Health & Place. It is one of the first to use GPS data to track adolescents combined with a comprehensive measure of the type of environment they are spending their spare time in. “We know that adolescence is where young people tend to get more independence and are very mobile, so this is a more accurate way of investigating where they are choosing to hang out,” Dr Hobbs says.
Previously there has been limited research conducted on the environmental risks to adolescent health, however they are a priority group because they are at an important life stage, he says.
“In recent decades the environments where children and teens live and play have changed substantially, including having, for instance, a higher number of fast-food restaurants in some areas.
“We need a greater understanding of how access to these features is affecting health behaviours and health outcomes, particularly because adverse environments are often more prevalent in the most deprived areas of Aotearoa New Zealand.”
He says adolescence is often associated with a decrease in physical activity and a rise in sedentary behaviour.
“It is likely that environmental factors play some part in this trend. I think the important aspects are whether teenagers can walk to school, do they have safe places to play with friends, what’s the traffic density like and how connected are the streets. It’s about having more neighbourhoods that promote physical activity.”
The study used environmental data from The Healthy Location Index, developed by a team of researchers, including Dr Hobbs and Spatial Data Scientist Dr Lukas Marek at UC’s GeoHealth Laboratory. The Healthy Location Index classifies areas of Aotearoa New Zealand based on how healthy or unhealthy the neighbourhood is.
Overall, the participants in the new study spent most of their measured time in the school domain (4.8 hours per day), closely followed by home (4.3 hours a day), and other areas (2.3 hours per day). More time was spent travelling in a motor vehicle (31 minutes per day) compared to pedestrianised travel (23 minutes per day), and more time was spent sedentary, compared to light or moderate intensity exercise.
As the proportion of time spent in areas with greater access to health-promoting features increased, the amount of sedentary time and travel in a vehicle fell.
Expert Reaction
These comments have been collated by the Science Media Centre to provide a variety of expert perspectives on this issue. Feel free to use these quotes in your stories. Views expressed are the personal opinions of the experts named. They do not represent the views of the SMC or any other organisation unless specifically stated.
Dr Matt Hobbs, Senior Lecturer, Faculty of Health, University of Canterbury
Why did we need to conduct this study?
Achieving the recommended amount of physical activity is beneficial for adolescents both in the short-term for better academic achievement at school and in the long-term for better health. We also know that getting the recommended amount of physical activity can help improve our mental health, by improving mood or decreasing the risk of anxiety and depression. This is important as the prevalence of mental disorders have risen significantly in New Zealand. Despite this, New Zealand adolescents are some of the most inactive in the world and it is known that physical activity levels decline significantly in adolescence. It is also likely that environmental factors play some part in this trend of declining physical activity levels.
What did we do?
To investigate if the environment was related to physical activity, the study tracked 200 adolescents over several weeks using GPS devices to see if the environment that an adolescent spent their time in was related to their physical activity and other transport related behaviours like vehicle travel. The environment was defined using the newly developed Healthy Location Index which classifies areas of Aotearoa New Zealand based on how healthy or unhealthy a neighbourhood is. The Healthy Location Index ranks each small area of New Zealand based on their access to five health-promoting features (i.e. parks, physical activity facilities) and five health-constraining features (i.e. liquor stores, fast-food outlets). For example, areas classified as ‘unhealthy’ would have close proximity to health-constraining features but would not have access to health-promoting features.
What did we find?
In summary, the findings did suggest that the environment may contribute to the variation in adolescent activity behaviour. For instance, the study showed that the more time adolescents spent in areas with access to health-promoting features, the less time they spent sedentary or travelling by vehicle. For instance, for every 1% increase in time in areas with the lowest access to health-promoting environments, sedentary time increased by 1.6 min and motor vehicle travel increased by 0.47 min.
What does this mean?
Adolescence is a crucial period of our lives which can shape our future health behaviours and is characterised by physiological, mental and social change. Despite the benefits, a rapid and steep decrease in levels of physical activity and increases in levels of sedentary behaviour (sitting time) occurs in New Zealand adolescents. Our study confirms that the environment may have a notable impact on behaviour and that is why international organisations like the United Nations have included in their Sustainable Development Goals, “by 2030, provide universal access to safe, inclusive and accessible, green and public spaces, in particular for women and children, older persons and persons with disabilities”. It is unlikely that our young New Zealanders will make healthier choices in an environment that is constantly pushing them in the wrong direction.