Splitting coral reefs into 3 classes could help us get the best bang for our conservation buck

Publicly released:
Australia; QLD; TAS

Splitting coral reefs into three different classes, based on the amount of fish - but also rate at which that amount of fish can be produced and replaced - could help us know where to put Marine Protected Areas to get the best returns on conservation efforts. The researchers found that by classifying reefs as either sites with high fish biomass, sites with high turnover or sites with low biomass/turnover, we could help better direct conservation resources. They found that sites with high fish biomass are often in remote areas with minimal human impact and that these could be the locations most suited to establishing no-entry or no-take marine reserves.

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research Springer Nature, Web page Please link to the article in online versions of your report (the URL will go live after the embargo ends).
Journal/
conference:
Nature Sustainability
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS), University of Tasmania, Univ Montpellier, France
Funder: This research was partly funded through the 2017–2018 Belmont Forum and BiodivERsA REEF-FUTURES project under the BiodivScen ERA-Net COFUND programme and with funding from ANR, DFG, NSF, Royal Society, ERC and NSERC. E.M. was supported by an Early Career Fellowship from the Leverhulme Trust.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.