Specific hormone therapies linked to heart and clot risks for menopausal women

Publicly released:
Australia; International; NSW
Photo by Ksenia Yakovleva on Unsplash
Photo by Ksenia Yakovleva on Unsplash

Some hormone replacement therapy (HRT) drugs taken by women to alleviate menopausal symptoms are linked to a higher risk of heart disease and rare but serious blood clots, according to Australian and international researchers. The team compared the rate of a series of clots, strokes, heart disease and heart attacks among nearly 80,000 women using one of eight HRT methods with nearly 850,000 women not using HRT. They say they found various links between the different HRT medications and the health complications they looked at - Use of oral oestrogen progestin therapy was associated with an increased risk of heart disease and blood clots, and the use of tibolone was associated with an increased risk of heart disease, stroke and heart attacks but not blood clots.

Media release

From: BMJ Group

The BMJ
Externally peer reviewed? Yes
Evidence type: Observational (emulated target trial)
Subjects: Women

Certain HRT tablets linked to increased heart disease and blood clot risk

Different hormone combinations and delivery methods have varying effects on heart health, say researchers

Certain hormone replacement therapy (HRT) tablets containing both oestrogen and progestogen are associated with a higher risk of heart disease and rare but serious blood clots known as venous thromboembolism (VTE) in women around the age of menopause, finds a study from Sweden published by The BMJ today.

Another HRT tablet called tibolone was associated with an increased risk of heart disease, heart attack and stroke, but not blood clots, “highlighting the diverse effects of different hormone combinations and administration methods on the risk of cardiovascular disease,” say the researchers.

HRT is used to relieve menopausal symptoms such as hot flushes and night sweats and different treatments are available depending on symptoms.

Some previous trials have suggested a link between menopausal hormone therapy and an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, but information on risks linked to different types of therapy during menopausal transition age is lacking.

To address this, researchers set out to assess the effect of contemporary menopausal hormone therapy on the risk of cardiovascular disease according to the route of administration and combination of hormones.

Their findings are based on data from 138 emulated trials (observational studies that mimic clinical trials), involving 919,614 healthy women in Sweden aged 50-58 between 2007 and 2020 who had not used hormone therapy in the previous two years. They excluded women with a history of heart disease, stroke, narrowed arteries, or cancer, and who had undergone surgery to remove their ovaries, a hysterectomy, or sterilisation.

Using monthly prescription records, the women were assigned to one of eight menopausal hormone treatment groups: oral combined continuous, oral combined sequential, oral unopposed oestrogen, oral oestrogen with local progestin, tibolone, transdermal combined, transdermal unopposed oestrogen, or no menopausal hormone therapy.

Hospital records were then used to track cardiovascular events over two years, and other potentially influential factors such as age, education level, region of residence, high blood pressure and diabetes were taken into account.

During this monitoring period, 24,089 cardiovascular events were recorded among the 919,614 women in the study.

Compared with not starting menopausal hormone therapy, starting oral combined continuous therapy or tibolone was associated with an increased risk of ischemic heart disease. This translates to approximately 11 new cases of ischaemic heart disease per 1,000 women who start treatment with oral combined continuous therapy or tibolone over one year.

No increased risk of cardiovascular disease was found for transdermal treatments, which include skin patches, gels and creams.

An increased risk of blood clots was also found for oral combined continuous, oral combined sequential, oral unopposed oestrogen, and transdermal combined therapy. “If 1,000 women started each of these treatments and were observed for a year, we would expect to see seven new cases of venous thromboembolism across all groups,” say the authors.

Tibolone was also linked to an increased risk of stroke and heart attack, but not blood clots.

These are observational findings, so no firm conclusions can be drawn about causality, and the authors point to limitations including a lack of data on menopausal status and the possibility that other unmeasured factors, such as smoking and body mass index, may have affected their results.

However, by using an emulated target trial design they reduced the bias common to observational studies and use of registry data allowed them to distinguish between different types of hormone therapies, including differences in administration, regimens, and combinations of hormones.

As such, they say: “These findings highlight the diverse effects of different hormone combinations and administration methods on the risk of cardiovascular disease.”

Future research should investigate the potential various effects on the risk of cardiovascular disease based on different progestogens used in menopausal hormone therapy, they add.

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research BMJ Group, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Journal/
conference:
The BMJ
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: Garvan Institute of Medical Research, The University of New South Wales, Uppsala University, Sweden
Funder: This study was primarily funded by the Swedish Brain Foundation and the FGS Fang Foundation (administrated by the Swedish Brain Foundation) (FO2022-0353, FO2021-0323, FO2023- 0139). Other funders include the Swedish Heart Lung Foundation (20230589), the Swedish Research Council (2023-02983), and the Uppsala University centre for women’s mental health during the reproductive lifespan (WOMHER). ÅJ is funded by the Swedish Brain Foundation, the FGS Fang Foundation the Swedish Heart Lung Foundation, the Swedish Research Council and the Uppsala University centre for women’s mental health during the reproductive lifespan (WOMHER). The funding sources had no role in the design of this study and did not have any role during its execution, analysis, interpretation of the data, or the decision to submit the results for publication.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.