EXPERT REACTION: Specific diabetes drugs may reduce dementia risk

Publicly released:
International
Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on Unsplash
Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on Unsplash

A specific drug used to treat type 2 diabetes could potentially reduce the risk of dementia, according to Korean research. Type 2 diabetes itself is associated with an increased risk of dementia, so researchers paired up over 100,000 Koreans aged 40-69 with type 2 diabetes - half of whom were treating it with a SGLT-2 inhibitor, while the other half were using DPP-4 inhibitors - and monitored dementia diagnoses within the group. 1172 of the participants were diagnosed with dementia during the study, the researchers say, and they say those using a SGLT-2 inhibitor had a 35% reduced risk of dementia compared to the DPP-4 group. This reduced risk appeared to be stronger for those who had been using SGLT-2 inhibitors for longer, they say. The researchers note this type of study cannot prove the type of diabetes drug is causing the reduced rate of dementia, however they say randomised controlled trials should be done to see if they support this finding.

Media release

From: BMJ Group


Certain diabetes drugs might prevent dementia

But randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors used to treat type 2 diabetes might prevent dementia, providing greater benefits with longer treatment, suggests a large study from Korea published by The BMJ today.

As this study was observational, the researchers note that the effect size could have been overestimated and say randomised controlled trials are now needed to confirm these findings.

According to the World Health Organization, the number of people with dementia globally is expected to reach 78 million by 2030 and type 2 diabetes is associated with a greater risk of developing dementia.

A recent study of over 65s with type 2 diabetes suggested a decreased risk of dementia associated with SGLT-2 inhibitors versus another type of diabetes drug, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors. But the effects on younger people and specific types of dementia (eg, Alzheimer’s disease, vascular dementia) remains unclear.

To address this, researchers used the Korea National Health Insurance Service database to identify 110,885 pairs of adults with type 2 diabetes aged 40-69 years who were free of dementia and started taking either an SGLT-2 inhibitor or a DPP-4 inhibitor between 2013 and 2021.

All participants (average age 62; 56% men) were matched by age, sex, use of the diabetes drug metformin, and baseline cardiovascular risk and were followed up for an average of 670 days to see who developed dementia.

Potentially influential factors including personal characteristics, income level, underlying risk factors for dementia, other conditions and related medicine use, were also taken into account.

Over the follow-up period, a total of 1,172 participants with newly diagnosed dementia were identified.

Dementia rates per 100 person years were 0.22 for those using SGLT-2 inhibitors and 0.35 for those using DPP-4 inhibitors, corresponding to a 35% reduced risk of dementia associated with use of SGLT-2 inhibitors compared with DPP-4 inhibitors.

The researchers also found a 39% reduced risk for Alzheimer’s disease, and a 52% reduced risk for vascular dementia associated with SGLT-2 inhibitors compared with DPP-4 inhibitors.

What’s more, the effect of SGLT-2 inhibitors seemed more pronounced with longer treatment duration. A 48% reduced risk of dementia was seen for more than two years of treatment versus a 43% reduced risk for two years or less.

This is an observational study so no firm conclusions can be drawn about cause and effect, and the authors note that details of health behaviours (eg, smoking and alcohol consumption) and duration of type 2 diabetes were not fully available.

However, they point out that this was a large study based on nationally representative data that included relatively younger people with type 2 diabetes, and results were highly consistent across subgroups.

As such, they say SGLT-2 inhibitors might prevent dementia, providing greater benefits with longer treatment, and they call for randomised controlled trials to confirm these findings.

This study reports promising results that have important implications for clinical practice as well as from a public health perspective, say researchers from Taiwan in a linked editorial.

They agree that further trials are needed to confirm these findings, and suggest that studies are also needed “to explore the underlying mechanisms of any neuroprotective effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors.”

As no cure currently exists for dementia and few effective treatment options are available, strategies that can potentially prevent onset are critically important, they write.

Given the substantial socioeconomic and public health burdens associated with both dementia and type 2 diabetes, they also recommend that clinical guidelines and healthcare policies should be updated regularly to incorporate latest best evidence on the potential benefits of SGLT-2 inhibitors, including reduced dementia risk.

Expert Reaction

These comments have been collated by the Science Media Centre to provide a variety of expert perspectives on this issue. Feel free to use these quotes in your stories. Views expressed are the personal opinions of the experts named. They do not represent the views of the SMC or any other organisation unless specifically stated.

Professor Henry Brodaty is Scientia Professor of Ageing and Mental Health and Co-Director of the Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA) at UNSW Sydney

The publication in The BMJ is exciting news and provides yet another avenue for the prevention of dementia, in particular Alzheimer's and vascular dementia.

This impressive and very large study from Korea of 110,885 pairs of adults compared how two anti-diabetic drugs influenced the likelihood of developing dementia over eight years in adults aged 40-69 years with type 2 diabetes.

People on an SGLT-2 inhibitor had a 35% lower rate of dementia compared to those on a DPP-4 inhibitor, a different anti-diabetic drug. The reductions were similar regardless of whether cases of any dementia or just those with Alzheimer's or vascular dementia were considered.

People who took the SGLT- 2 inhibitor for more than two years had a stronger benefit than people who took it for two years or less. Suggested mechanisms of how this could work are direct neuroprotective effects and fewer deposits of toxic proteins implicated in Alzheimer's in the brain.

As this is an observational study, not a trial, the findings have limitations. It is premature we should be prescribing semaglutide to prevent dementia. We now need a large randomised controlled trial to determine how useful this will be. For example, we don't know if it works in older people, people without diabetes, or people who already have early signs of dementia.

Last updated:  30 Aug 2024 9:43am
Contact information
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.
Declared conflicts of interest None declared.

Dr Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz is an epidemiologist and Senior Research Fellow from the University of Wollongong

This is a very interesting study looking at the potential for SGLT2 drugs, a newer type of diabetes medication, to prevent dementia. Using an observational approach, the authors found that people taking SGLT2s were quite a bit less likely to get dementia than people taking a somewhat older type of medication called a DPP4i. 

Because of the observational nature of this study, it’s hard to know if this means that SGLT2s prevent dementia or if there are other factors at play. The study was impressively robust, but even very good observational studies may have unseen issues that impact their results. There are some indications in this paper that the effect (reducing dementia) may in part be due to better diabetes control rather than some direct impact of SGLT2s.

However, the findings do raise a very interesting possibility for preventing dementia, which is at the moment both hard to prevent and treat. The authors recommend looking into this further in randomized trials, which seems like an extremely good idea.

Last updated:  29 Aug 2024 9:40am
Contact information
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.
Declared conflicts of interest None declared.

Professor Amy Brodtmann is a Professor in the School of Translational Medicine at Monash University, Cognitive Neurology Clinical Lead at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, Director of the Eastern Cognitive Disorders Clinic, and an Honorary Professor at the Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health

People with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have an increased risk of dementia. Many factors may contribute to this strong association, including increased risk of stroke, narrowing and thickening of the small vessels in the brain and the cross-association of mid-life obesity and diabets. Efforts to treat vascular risk factors, both high blood pressure and diabetes, have been proposed as a means to reduce global dementia burden. There is now evidence that some drugs commonly used in the treatment of diabetes may be protective against cognitive decline.

Diabetes drugs are usually referred to by their class and include sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, like empagliflozin/Jardiance®, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4, gliptins) like sitagliptin/Januvia®, and the ones most in the news for weight loss, the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, like semaglutide/Ozempic®. We’ve known for a while that SGLT-2 inhibitors can have benefits beyond controlling blood sugars.

The authors looked at Korean National Health Insurance Service data on people aged 40-69 years who were taking SGLT-2 inhibitors – what’s called a pharmaco-epidemiological approach. They compared those on the SGLT-2 inhibitors to those taking DPP-4 inhibitors. They found that the risk of any type of dementia was reduced in people on these drugs, as well as the specific risk for Alzheimer’s dementia and vascular dementia. Overall, they found a 35% relative reduction in dementia risk, but it also looked like the longer you were on the drugs, the greater the effect.

The study is observational, meaning that future randomised controlled trials will be needed. There is evidence that other classes of drugs, like the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, and blood pressure control tablets, may also protect cognition. Whilst we are at the beginning of medications to treat dementia, current drugs are far from a cure. This makes this exciting news for the more than 400,000 people in Australia with dementia. It doesn’t mean that if you take this pill that you will never get dementia, but it gives further weight to the belief that risk factor reduction – good control of diabetes and blood pressure – coupled with a ‘brain health optimised’ lifestyle – great diet, lots of exercise and social engagement – goes a long way towards protecting your brain.

Last updated:  29 Aug 2024 9:38am
Contact information
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.
Declared conflicts of interest I am an invited attendee for the Novo Nordisk SciComm 2024 Advisory Board, the makers of semaglutide. I am a neurologist not endocrinologist and have never prescribed any of the drugs mentioned in these studies. Chair/Member Scientific Advisory Boards for Biogen, Eisai, Eli Lilly and Roche. Non-financial: Dementia Australia Honorary Medical Advisor. I am head of 2 cognitive neurology services in Melbourne at RMH and Box Hill Hospital. I have done research with my group on the links between dementia and T2DM.

Associate Prof Takechi is from the Curtin Medical Research Institute at Curtin University

Previous studies on the effects of anti-diabetic drugs on dementia risks have been inconclusive e.g. metformin, the frontline anti-diabetic drug, is reported to increase the risk of Alzheimer’s in Asian populations (JAD 2022 Anling Luo et al.). The study is really important in providing strong evidence that the use of SGLT-2 is associated with a substantially reduced risk of dementia. The use of a robust, large dataset gives a reasonable confidence in the accuracy of the outcomes.

A report by Brown et al indicates that if interventions delay both disease onset and progression by a modest one year, there would be nearly 9.2 million fewer cases of the disease in 2050 world-wide, so the impact could be remarkable.

However, there are a few limitations to point out. As noted in the Editorial, the data only follows up for less than a two year period, whilst ‘silent’ dementia pathologies are known to progressively develop over years and decades. Also, the study does not consider the dosage and duration of these drugs. It would have made the study much stronger if the authors could indicate the association with risk reduction against the ‘net exposure (cumulative dose + duration factors)’.

Finally, also noted in the Editorial too but in these studies, the accuracy of diagnosis and its timing can be a concern. However in Korea, unlike the UK or Australia, the GP system is not common and ICD-10 indicated diagnoses are normally given by specialist, which increases the accuracy compared to healthcare system with GP.

Last updated:  28 Aug 2024 4:42pm
Contact information
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.
Declared conflicts of interest None .

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research BMJ Group, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Editorial / Opinion BMJ Group, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Journal/
conference:
The BMJ
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: Seoul National University, South Korea
Funder: This study was supported by the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI)-AZ Diabetes Research programme (grant No 08-2022-0261). The funders had no role in considering the study design or in the collection, analysis, interpretation of data, writing of the report, or decision to submit the article for publication.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.