Screening women for breast cancer from 40 rather than 50 may help save lives

Publicly released:
International
CC-0
CC-0

A mammography screening strategy based on a baseline breast density measure at age 40 may be the most effective and cost-effective way to reduce deaths from breast cancer, according to a US computer modelling study. Currently, women are screened from age 50 in Australia. The researchers compared health outcomes and cost-effectiveness of seven screening strategies: no screening, biennial screening between age 50-75, triennial screening between 50-75, and four breast density-stratified strategies (two with baseline mammogram at age 40, and the other two at age 50). 

Media release

From: American College of Physicians

Screening strategy based on baseline breast density at age 40 may be effective and cost-effective for reducing breast cancer mortality

A mammography screening strategy based on a baseline breast density measure at age 40 may be the most effective and cost-effective way to reduce breast cancer mortality. Current breast cancer screening guidelines recommend that mammography begins at age 50 for women at average risk. Findings from a microsimulation modeling study are published in Annals of Internal Medicine.

High breast density not only has a masking effect on mammogram reading, it also increases the risk of breast cancer. The Breast Density Notification Act requires providers to inform women who have a mammogram whether they have dense breasts. However, most women do not know their breast density classification until after their first mammogram at age 50.

Researchers from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and Fred Hutch Cancer Center used a microsimulation model to compare the health outcomes and cost-effectiveness of 7 breast cancer screening strategies: no screening, biennial screening between age 50-75, triennial screening between 50-75, and four density-stratified strategies (two with baseline mammogram at age 40, and the other two at age 50). All density-stratified strategies assigned annual screening to women with dense breasts, and biennial or triennial starting at age 50 for women without dense breasts.

The model suggests that the strategy with a baseline breast density assessment at age 40, followed by annual screening between age 40 and 75 for women with dense breasts and biennial screening between 50 and 75 for women without dense breasts had the greatest reduction in breast cancer mortality, but was also associated with a larger number of mammograms lifetime and higher rates of false positives and overdiagnosis. A cost-effectiveness analysis that considered the benefits and harms showed that when compared to non-density-stratified biennial screening age 50 - 75, the above density-stratified strategy yielded an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of about $36,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), which is considered cost-effective.

The authors of an accompanying editorial from the University of California, San Francisco argue that breast density is an important risk factor to include in risk-based screening strategies because it is both a strong and prevalent risk factor accounting for a large proportion of breast cancers. However, it should be combined with age and other risk factors when developing risk-based screening strategies that optimize benefits and minimize harms. The editorialists believe that until a more robust risk-based strategy is identified, data supports screening biennially from ages 50 to 74 years.

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research American College of Physicians, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Editorial / Opinion American College of Physicians, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Journal/
conference:
Annals of Internal Medicine
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, USA
Funder: No information provided.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.