Protecting 'Nature's Strongholds' could help stem the loss of animal and plant species

Publicly released:
Australia; NSW; VIC; QLD
In the Nature's Stronghold of Madidi, Bolivia: Multiple jurisdictions with Tacana and Lecos de Apolo Indigenous Territories in the foreground, and across the Tuichi River, the Madidi National Park. Credit: Omar Torrico (CC-BY 4.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
In the Nature's Stronghold of Madidi, Bolivia: Multiple jurisdictions with Tacana and Lecos de Apolo Indigenous Territories in the foreground, and across the Tuichi River, the Madidi National Park. Credit: Omar Torrico (CC-BY 4.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Protecting large, interconnected, ecologically intact areas of the world, could be an effective way to conserve biodiversity at a global scale, according to Australian and international experts. These areas, which the authors call - 'Nature's Strongholds' - are particularly important for biodiversity conservation and could help us effectively meet the global targets of protecting at least 30% of the global land and ocean by 2030, known as the 30x30 target. The authors identify key examples of Nature's Strongholds in the high-biodiversity tropical forest regions of Central Africa and the Amazon. 

Media release

From: PLOS

Conservation of Nature’s Strongholds needed to halt biodiversity loss

Researchers argue for scaling-up area-based conservation to maintain ecological integrity

To achieve global biodiversity targets, conservationists and governments must prioritize the establishment and effective management of large, interconnected protected areas with high ecological integrity, John G. Robinson from the Wildlife Conservation Society, US, and colleagues argue in an essay publishing May 21st in the open-access journal PLOS Biology.

The Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF), signed at the 2022 Conference of Parties to the UN Convention on Biological Diversity in Montreal, recognized the importance of protecting large areas of natural habitat to maintain the resilience and integrity of ecosystems.  To halt biodiversity loss, these protected and conserved areas need to be in the right places, connected to one another, and well managed. One of the GBF targets is to protect at least 30% of the global land and ocean by 2030, known as the 30x30 target. 

To achieve GBF targets, the authors propose prioritizing large, interconnected protected areas with high ecological integrity, that are effectively managed and equitably governed. They emphasize the importance of conserving landscapes at scales large enough to encompass functioning ecosystems and the biodiversity they contain. In many cases, this will require interconnected groups of protected areas that are managed together. Effective governance means that the diversity of stakeholders and rights holders are recognized and that the costs and benefits are shared equitably between them. The authors argue that protected and conservation areas that meet all four criteria — which they name “Nature’s Strongholds” — will be disproportionately important for biodiversity conservation. They identify examples of Nature’s Strongholds in the high-biodiversity tropical forest regions of Central Africa and the Amazon.

By applying the four criteria presented in this essay to identify Nature’s Strongholds around the world, governments and conservationists can coordinate their efforts to best address threats to biodiversity, the authors say.

The authors add, “‘Nature's Strongholds’ - large, interconnected, ecologically intact areas that are well managed and equitably governed - are identified in Amazonia and Central Africa.  The approach offers an effective way to conserve biodiversity at a global scale.”

#####

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research PLOS, Web page Please link to the article in online versions of your report (the URL will go live after the embargo ends).
Journal/
conference:
PLOS Biology
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: The University of New South Wales, The University of Queensland, Bush Heritage Australia, Wildlife Conservation Society, USA
Funder: Wildlife Conservation Society received support for this work from the Acacia Conservation Fund and the Arcadia Fund (Grant number #AE4195), private philanthropic organizations. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.