Prompting Twitter users to consider accuracy may help fight fake news

Publicly released:
International
CC-0
CC-0

Prompting people to reflect on the accuracy of news headlines increases the quality of news that they share online, according to international scientists. To understand why people share fake stories, the researchers asked people to rate the accuracy of news and whether they would share it. They found people were more likely to share fake news when it agreed with their political views. Subsequent experiments demonstrated that, when prompted to consider the accuracy of headlines, people shared fewer false news stories. Then the researchers took their study into the Twittersphere, and found that when users were sent a private message asking them to rate the accuracy of a single news headline, the accuracy and quality of the news sources they shared improved. The fast pace of Twitter and other social platforms may distract us from considering the accuracy of what we're sharing, they conclude.

News release

From: Springer Nature

Changing views on sharing ‘fake news’ 

Prompting people to reflect on the accuracy of news headlines increases the quality of news that they share online, according to a study published online in Nature this week. The research, which includes a field experiment on Twitter, suggests that social media platforms could remind users to check the accuracy of information to improve the quality of news circulating online.

To understand why people share misinformation on social media and how to reduce this behaviour, Gordon Pennycook and colleagues performed a number of survey experiments in which individuals were asked to rate the accuracy of news and whether they would share it. In the initial experiments, groups were presented with real news stories (half of which were untrue) and were asked to either judge the accuracy of the headline or indicate whether they would consider sharing the headlines. True headlines were rated as accurate more often than false headlines; however, individuals were twice as likely to consider sharing false but politically concordant headlines than they were to rate such headlines as accurate. Despite these results, most participants stated that it was extremely important to share only accurate information on social media, which indicates that some people may not intentionally spread misinformation.

Subsequent experiments demonstrated that, when prompted to consider the accuracy of headlines, people shared fewer false news stories. The authors suggest that the sharing of false information may be due to inattention. In a field experiment involving 5,379 Twitter users they found that when individuals were sent a private message asking them to rate the accuracy of a single news headline, the accuracy and quality of the news sources shared improved.

The current design of social media platforms — in which a wide variety of content is available and users receive rapid social feedback on their sharing — may be distracting people from considering accuracy, the authors propose. They conclude that adding periodic reminders to users to rate the accuracy of information could potentially reduce the spread of misinformation online.

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research Springer Nature, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Journal/
conference:
Nature
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: University of Regina, Canada
Funder: The Ethics and Governance of Artificial Intelligence Initiative of the Miami Foundation, the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, the Omidyar Network, the John Templeton Foundation grant 61061, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.