Overgrazing is threatening global drylands

Publicly released:
Australia; International; NSW
Sheep grazing in a semiarid Patagonian rangeland in Argentina. Photo: Valeria Aramayo.
Sheep grazing in a semiarid Patagonian rangeland in Argentina. Photo: Valeria Aramayo.

Aussie and international scientists have revealed the first global estimates of how grazing will affect ecosystem services across the world’s drylands, finding that the positive effects of grazing by livestock and wild herbivores can turn negative as temperatures become warmer. Grazing is a trillion-dollar industry and is particularly important in drylands, which cover about 40 per cent of Earth's land surface and support half of the world’s livestock. Livestock are critical for food, shelter and a source of capital, but changing climates threaten livestock production and the livelihoods of billions of people worldwide.

Media release

From: The University of New South Wales

Grazing is a trillion-dollar industry, and is particularly important in drylands, which cover about 40 percent of Earth's land surface and support half of the world’s livestock. Livestock are critical for food, shelter and a source of capital, but changing climates threaten livestock production and the livelihoods of billions of people worldwide.

An international team of scientists has published a study in Science today with the first global estimates of how grazing will affect ecosystem services across the world’s drylands. The research, led by the Dryland Ecology and Global Change group in Spain with collaborators from UNSW Sydney, shows that grazing by livestock and wild herbivores in drylands can have positive effects on ecosystem services, but these effects can turn negative as Earth’s temperature becomes warmer.

Effects on ecosystem services can turn negative

The ecosystem services affected by grazing include the ability of soils to grow plants, break down organic matter and make it available for plants, store carbon, create fertile soils and regulate water supply.

The researchers found that grazing pressure was critical for driving all ecosystem services, particularly for carbon storage, organic matter decomposition, soil fertility, and the quality and amount of forage produced.

“Grazing can have positive effects on ecosystem services, particularly in species-rich ecosystems,” says Professor David Eldridge, Centre for Ecosystem Science at UNSW Sydney, who is a senior author of the paper. “But these positive effects turn to negative under a warmer climate.”

For the study, the researchers used standard protocols to assess the impacts of increasing grazing pressure on the ability of global drylands to deliver nine essential ecosystem services.

The team of more than 100 colleagues carried out the unique global survey of 326 drylands from 25 countries, collecting information on plants and soils at sites spanning low to high grazing pressure. Some sites had no grazing, others had high densities of sheep and cattle. Yet others were grazed by wild herbivores such as zebra in Africa and llama in Chile.

Responses to grazing depend on climate

The researchers found that the relationships between climate, soil conditions, biodiversity and ecosystem services depended on the level of grazing pressure considered.

“The responses of some ecosystem services to climate varied with local grazing pressure,” Professor Eldridge says.

“For example, stocks of soil carbon declined and soil erosion increased as the climate became warmer, but only under high grazing pressure.”

These results suggest that the response of drylands to ongoing climate change may depend on how we managed them locally as the climate heats up.

Plant diversity and different herbivores

The study found that any effects of increasing grazing pressure shifted from mostly positive in colder drylands with less seasonal rainfall and greater plant diversity, to negative in hotter drylands, with highly seasonal rainfall and lower plant diversity.

‘We know from other work that maintaining high plant diversity is an important strategy in drylands”, says Professor Fernando T. Maestre at the Dry Ecology and Global Change Lab and lead author of the study.

“A diverse plant community can help us buffer the negative effects of climate change on dryland soils.”

The authors also observed that a greater diversity of herbivore types was positively linked to some services such as carbon storage, which is critically important as a climate regulator.

“There is no one-size-fits-all when it comes to grazing in drylands. Any effects of grazing, particularly overgrazing, will vary across the globe, making it important to consider local condition and the type and number of livestock – and wild herbivores,” Professor Eldridge says.

Journal/
conference:
Science
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: The University of New South Wales
Funder: European Research Council [ERC grant agreement 647038 (BIODESERT)] and Generalitat Valenciana (CIDEGENT/2018/ 041). F.T.M. acknowledges support from a Rei Jaume I Award, the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, and the Synthesis Center (sDiv) of the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research Halle– Jena–Leipzig (iDiv). C.A.G., S.C., and N.E. acknowledge support from iDiv and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG– FZT 118, 202548816; Flexpool proposal 34600850). Y.L.B.-P. was supported by a Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions Individual Fellowship (MSCA-IF) within the European Program Horizon 2020 (DRYFUN Project 656035). N.G. was supported by CAP 20-25 (16-IDEX-0001) and the AgreenSkills+ fellowship program, which has received funding from the EU’s Seventh Framework Programme under grant agreement N° FP7-609398 (AgreenSkills+ contract). B.B. and B.E. were supported by the Taylor Family–Asia Foundation Endowed Chair in Ecology and Conservation Biology. J.D., A.Ro., and H.C. acknowledge support from the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (IF/00950/ 2014 and 2020.03670.CEECIND, SFRH/BDP/108913/2015, and in the scope of the framework contract foreseen in the numbers 4-6 of the article 23, of the Decree-Law 57/2016, August 29, changed by Law 57/2017, July 19, respectively), as well as from the MCTES, FSE, UE, and the CFE (UIDB/04004/2020) research unit financed by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia/MCTES through national funds (PIDDAC). C.P. acknowledges support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (ref. AGL201675762-R, AEI/ FEDER, UE, and PID2020-116578RB-I00, MCIN/AEI/10.13039/ 501100011033) and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under grant agreement no. 101000224. E.V. was funded by the 2017 program for attracting and retaining talent of Comunidad de Madrid (no. 2017‐T2/ AMB‐5406). M.A.B. acknowledges support from the School of Forestry and College of the Environment, Forestry and Natural Sciences of Northern Arizona University. E.H.-S. acknowledges support from the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (SEP-CB-2015-01-251388, PN 2017-5036 and PRONAII 319059). F.M.H. acknowledges support from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq - PCI/INMA) of the Brazilian Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MCTI, processes number 302381/2020-1). H.L.T. acknowledges support from the US National Science Foundation (NSF) (DEB 0953864). A.N. and M.K. acknowledge support from the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BD/130274/2017, CEECIND/02453/2018/ CP1534/CT0001, PTDC/ASP-SIL/7743/2020 and UIDB/00329/ 2020). A.A.C. acknowledges support from the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001. J.E.K. and T.P.M. acknowledge the National Research Foundation of South Africa (grant no. 114412). F.J. and N.B. acknowledge support from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) in the framework of the SPACES projects OPTIMASS (FKZ: 01LL1302A) and ORYCS (FKZ: 01LL1804A). A.Li. and A.S.K.F. acknowledge support from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) in the framework of the SPACES projects Limpopo Living Landscapes (FKZ: 01LL1304D) and SALLnet (FKZ: 01LL1802C). L.W. acknowledges support from the US NSF (EAR 1554894). L.H.F. acknowledges support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Industrial Research Chair Program in Ecosystem Reclamation. S.C.R. acknowledges support from the US Geological Survey Ecosystems Mission Area and the US Bureau of Land Management. G.M.W. acknowledges support from the Australian Research Council. L.v.d.B. and K.T. acknowledge support from the German Research Foundation (DFG) priority research program SPP-1803 “EarthShape: Earth Surface Shaping by Biota” (TI 338/14-1). M.D.-B. acknowledges support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation for the I+D+i project PID2020- 115813RA-I00 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033. M.D.-B. is also supported by a project of the Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) and the Consejería de Transformación Económica, Industria, Conocimiento y Universidades of the Junta de Andalucía (FEDER Andalucía 2014-2020 Objetivo temático “01 - Refuerzo de la investigación, el desarrollo tecnológico y la innovación”) associated with the research project P20_00879 (ANDABIOMA). P.J.R. and A.J.M. acknowledge support from Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional through the FEDER Andalucía operative program, FEDER-UJA 1261180 project. A.F. thanks ANID PIA/BASAL FB210006 and Millennium Science Initiative Program NCN2021-050. A.J. acknowledges support from the Bavarian Research Alliance Germany (BayIntAn_UBT_2017_61). C.B. acknowledges the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 41971131). Biodiversity and ecosystem function research in the B.K.S. laboratory is funded by the Australian Research Council (DP210102081).
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.