One dose of smallpox vaccine moderately effective in preventing mpox infection

Publicly released:
International
CC-0. https://ccnull.de/foto/mpox-erkrankung/1100343
CC-0. https://ccnull.de/foto/mpox-erkrankung/1100343

One dose of modified vaccinia Ankara-Bavarian Nordic (MVA-BN) smallpox vaccine is moderately effective in preventing mpox infection and should be made available to communities at risk, according to international scientists. In the absence of clinical trials of vaccination against mpox, the team set out to estimate the effectiveness of one dose of the vaccine using a technique called target trial emulation, a technique that applies the rules of 'gold standard' clinical trials to the available data. A total of 3,204 men who received the vaccine were matched to 3,204 unvaccinated controls. Over the study period of 153 days, 71 mpox infections were diagnosed, 21 in the vaccinated group and 50 in the unvaccinated group. Those differences suggest the vaccine is 58% effective against infection, the authors say.

Media release

From: BMJ Group

One dose of smallpox vaccine moderately effective in preventing mpox infection

Vaccine should be made available to communities at risk, say researchers

One dose of modified vaccinia Ankara-Bavarian Nordic (MVA-BN) smallpox vaccine is moderately effective in preventing mpox infection and should be made available to communities at risk, finds a study published by The BMJ today.

With mpox infections rising again across the globe, the researchers say these findings “strengthen the evidence that MVA-BN is effective at preventing mpox infection and should be made available and accessible to communities at risk.”

No randomised clinical trials of vaccination against mpox have been conducted. Estimates of the effectiveness of a single dose of vaccination from observational studies range from 36% to 86%, but observational data can be prone to bias, which can lead to inaccurate or misleading results.

To address this, researchers set out to estimate the real world effectiveness of one dose of MVA-BN against mpox infection using a technique called target trial emulation. This applies the design principles of randomised trials to observational data to estimate the causal effect of an intervention, while reducing the biases common to observational studies.

Their findings are based on men aged at least 18 years, with a history of being tested for syphilis and a laboratory confirmed bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the previous year, or who filled a prescription for preventative HIV treatment in the previous year.

A total of 3,204 men who received the vaccine were matched to 3,204 unvaccinated controls. Over the study period of 153 days, 71 mpox infections were diagnosed, 21 in the vaccinated group (a rate of 0.09 per 1000 person days) and 50 in the unvaccinated group (a rate of 0.20 per 1000 person days).

The relative risk of infection in the vaccinated compared with the unvaccinated group was 0.42, thus the estimated vaccine effectiveness of one dose of MVA-BN against mpox infection was 58%.

The researchers acknowledge that rigorous matching led to a smaller sample size and they could not evaluate a two dose regimen or duration of protection. Information on previous smallpox vaccination, sexual exposures, and individual level measures of social determinants of health were also lacking.

However, results are based on reliable data from a publicly funded healthcare system, and were similar after further analysis to account for other potentially influential factors, providing greater confidence in the conclusions.

The researchers therefore conclude that in the absence of randomised clinical trials, “our findings strengthen the evidence that MVA-BN is effective at preventing mpox infection and should be made available and accessible to communities at risk.”

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research BMJ Group, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Journal/
conference:
The BMJ
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: ICES Central, Canada
Funder: This study was supported by ICES, which is funded by an annual grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Long-Term Care. This study also received funding from the Canadian Immunization Research Network through a grant from the Public Health Agency of Canada and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CNF 151944). The Canada-Africa Mpox Partnership, of which this study is one component, was also supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Rapid Mpox Research (MRR-184812). The opinions, results, and conclusions reported in this paper are those of the authors and are independent from the funding sources. Funders had no role in the design or conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. JCK is supported by a clinician-scientist award and ANB is supported by a non-clinician scientist award from the University of Toronto Department of Family and Community Medicine. SM, DT, and ANB are supported by Tier 2 Canada Research Chairs.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.