MRIs and mammograms with contrast best for women at risk of a missed breast cancer diagnosis

Publicly released:
International
Photo by Angiola Harry on Unsplash
Photo by Angiola Harry on Unsplash

Women with dense breasts are at a higher risk of a mammogram missing a breast cancer, and international researchers have looked at the best way to give these women additional screening to pick up what the mammogram might miss. To do this, the researchers randomly allocated over 9000 UK women with dense breasts and a negative mammogram to receive either a fast MRI, an ultrasound or a mammogram with contrast dye. They say cancer was detected in 1.7% of the MRI group, 1.9% of the contrast mammogram group and 0.4% for the ultrasound group. They say more research is needed to understand whether this increase in detection could lead to saved lives and look at the potential risks of overdiagnosis from offering extra screening.

Media release

From: The Lancet

Peer-reviewed / Randomised Controlled Trial / People

The Lancet: Additional imaging techniques detect early stage cancers missed by mammograms in women with dense breasts, finds trialIn women with dense breasts (breasts with relatively low levels of fatty tissue) and a negative mammogram, supplemental imaging techniques detect early-stage cancers, with imaging techniques three times more effective than ultrasound, finds a phase 3 randomised control trial published in The Lancet.

Women with extremely dense breasts, about 10% of those aged 50-70 years in the UK, face a fourfold increased risk of breast cancer compared to those with the least dense breasts*. Mammograms are less effective for detecting early-stage cancer in dense breasts, as the tissue can hide tumours on the breast x-rays. Previous studies have shown MRI and ultrasound are effective supplementary imaging methods, but this study is the first to compare them with contrast mammography in women with normal mammograms and dense breast tissue.

Over 9000 women in the UK with dense breasts and a negative mammogram were randomly allocated to one of three different supplementary techniques. The cancer detection rate for the imaging techniques was 1.7% (for a fast MRI) and 1.9% (for contrast mammography), whilst the cancer detection rate for the ultrasound group was 0.4%.

Authors highlight that although this study shows the scans can detect additional small cancers which are likely to save lives, further research is needed to confirm whether they could reduce the number of deaths due to breast cancer, to establish the risk of overdiagnosis and to estimate the cost benefit ratio of implementing a supplemental imaging strategy for breast cancer screening.

Lead author, Professor Fiona Gilbert, University of Cambridge (UK) says, “In addition to the relevance for the UK’s breast cancer screening programme, this study has global implications for all countries where screening is undertaken for women with dense breast tissue.”

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research The Lancet, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Journal/
conference:
The Lancet
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: University of Cambridge, UK
Funder: Cancer Research UK, GE Healthcare, and Bayer Healthcare.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.