Living near a hazardous waste site could lower life expectancy

Publicly released:
International
PHOTO: Donald Giannatti/Unsplash
PHOTO: Donald Giannatti/Unsplash

Living near a US Superfund site - an area polluted with hazardous waste that’s been designated to be cleaned up - could lower one’s life expectancy by roughly two months, according to new research. The researchers’ modelling also found that people living near such a contaminated area could have their life expectancy lowered by up to 1.22 years when paired with high sociodemographic disadvantages, such as low income. The researchers say that since these sites can often be prone to flooding, or simply lack a clean-up plan in place, this impact on life expectancy could be amplified.

Media release

From: Springer Nature

Living in close proximity to a superfund site (an area contaminated with hazardous substances) in the United States may decrease average life expectancy by 0.2 years, according to a new study in Nature Communications. These impacts could be further exacerbated by sociodemographic disadvantage and the impacts of climate change, the research suggests.

Millions of people across the United States live near superfund sites, each of which is characterized by the presence of hazardous wastes that require long-term clean-up efforts. The potential health impacts associated with proximity to superfund sites have not been assessed on a national level.

Hanadi Rifai and colleagues use a nationwide, geocoded statistical modelling analysis with census data to estimate how life expectancy, as a proxy for general health, is influenced by nearness to superfund sites. Life expectancy data were available for more than 65,000 of the 72,268 census tracts within the contiguous US. They find a small but significant difference between the life expectancies of people living close to superfund sites (within their census tracts) versus those who live further away from sites (none within their census tracts). The average decrease in life expectancy was found to be around 0.2 years, but there was a reduction of about 1.22 years for those in census tracts with both close proximity to superfund sites and sociodemographic disadvantages, such as low income, low education level, lack of citizenship, lack of insurance, or disabilities, relative to those with disadvantages not sharing census tracts with superfund sites.

A region’s preparedness and response to natural hazards like floods, which can disperse toxic chemicals and contaminate water supplies, also compounded the adverse effects of living near a superfund site. These impacts could become more pronounced in the future as climate change increases the frequency of such events. Health impacts were also higher in census tracts where hazardous waste clean-up plans were not put in place. However, the authors note that each superfund site requires individual investigation to more accurately estimate the harmful effect of its presence, if any, on people living in the vicinity of the site.

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research Springer Nature, Web page Full paper will be available after embargo ends.
Journal/
conference:
Nature Communications
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: University of Houston, USA; University of Texas at Austin, USA
Funder: Funding for the research was provided by the Hurricane Resilience Research Institute, an interdisciplinary research institute at the University of Houston focused on resilience to natural disasters, and RAPID grant # 1759440 from the National Science Foundation and King Abdullah University of Science and Technology grant OSR-2018-CRG7-3711.2.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.