'Illusion of certainty' means more Pike Rivers are likely

Publicly released:
New Zealand
Photo: New Zealand Government, Office of the Governor-General (CC BY 4.0)
Photo: New Zealand Government, Office of the Governor-General (CC BY 4.0)

The failures that led to one of New Zealand's worst mining disasters could happen again at any other organisation, warn the authors of a new study. The researchers spotlight the cognitive biases that were present in management of the Pike River coal mine, where 29 men were killed in a methane explosion in 2010. One of their "potentially disturbing observations" is that health & safety training, auditors, and well-qualified staff were not enough to prevent failure – and may also have provided an "illusion of certainty" and overconfidence. They say it's reasonable to assume that these types of disasters will keep occurring and perhaps even increase as organisations become more connected and complex.

Expert Reaction

These comments have been collated by the Science Media Centre to provide a variety of expert perspectives on this issue. Feel free to use these quotes in your stories. Views expressed are the personal opinions of the experts named. They do not represent the views of the SMC or any other organisation unless specifically stated.

Dr Richard Logan, School of Management, Victoria University of Wellington

Organisational drift into failure: A case study of the 2010 Pike River Coal mine disaster reflects on what we can still learn from the Pike River disaster fifteen years later.

Whilst a subsequent Royal Commission of Inquiry investigated and reported their findings as to the causes of the disaster and this was followed by a number of articles and books, there is a general sense of unfinished business, especially in the leadership and governance space.

This article takes a complexity perspective to accident investigation rather than the normal ‘broken components and bad people’ linear model that is widely applied.

The article considers management thinking in the ‘incubation’ period leading up to the disaster, with a focus on their uncertainty aversion, their unchallenged management narratives, their ‘failure of foresight’, and why these lessons are not unique to Pike River Coal Ltd., and why it poses a serious and mostly unrecognised risk for senior decision-making in complex organisations anywhere in the world.

Last updated:  30 May 2025 8:57am
Contact information
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.
Declared conflicts of interest Author of this research.
Journal/
conference:
Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: Victoria University of Wellington
Funder: N/A
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.