"Icehouse" not "greenhouse" models needed to forecast global warming

Publicly released:
International
Photo by Derek Oyen on Unsplash
Photo by Derek Oyen on Unsplash

Modellers predicting climate change look back in time to find similar global warming events - but they may be looking at the wrong parts of the Earth's history. An international team, including researchers from New Zealand, looked back 304 million years ago to a time when the Earth had large stocks of ice, as it does today. When ice melts on the surface of the ocean, it can form a barrier to oxygen circulation, and the oxygen levels in the oceans drop and cause marine life to die. The research suggests that an "icehouse" climate may be more sensitive to changes in atmospheric carbon dioxide than a "greenhouse" climate, and if we continue to rely on greenhouse comparisons we may be underestimating the rate and effect of global warming.

Media release

From: University of Waikato

Have we been looking at the wrong data?


The recently released IPCC report into mitigating the effects of climate change makes for scary
reading - if we don’t do something soon to stop the temperature rise, it will soon be unstoppable.
It’s sobering and more than a little frightening.


But what if we’ve been looking at the wrong data?


A recently released paper published by PNAS "Marine anoxia linked to abrupt global warming
during Earth's penultimate icehouse", by University of Waikato researchers Terry Isson, Kierstin
Daviau and Sofia Rauzi from the Earth-Life Interactions (ELI) research group, suggest that we
may have been looking at the wrong part of the Earth’s history as analogues for past global
warming events. This work is carried out in collaboration with UC Davis, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Yale University, Texas A&M University amongst others.


“The research comes down to the different environments the Earth is operating under,” Terry
says. “At the moment, we’re in an ‘icehouse’ phase, with glaciers and ice caps. The data we
look at for forecasting the effects of global warming come from a period of ‘greenhouse’ when
the Earth didn’t have massive stocks of ice.”


Isson's research suggests that global warming events that take place during icehouse worlds
may have more severe impacts, in particular the loss of ocean oxygen, compared to those that
occur during greenhouse periods.


“We know that global warming affects oxygen levels and how acidic our oceans are. This has a
flow on effect to the kind of life that our oceans can sustain.


“This research indicates that this process may be more rapid and more severe in our current
climate and we may be seriously underestimating the rate and effect of global warming if we
continue to rely on greenhouse comparisons.”


Isson says the greenhouse analogy is used because these events have already been identified
and it’s the most commonly used data. “We have to go back a lot further in time to find an Earth
climate state similar to the one we are currently living in to make the comparison to an icehouse
environment,” he says.

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research PNAS, Web page
Media Release UC Davis, Web page
Journal/
conference:
Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: University of Waikato, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing
Funder: This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 42072035, 91955201, 41630101, and 41830323), the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant XDB26000000), and the NSF (Grants EAR1338281 to I.P.M. and 1338200 to C.J.P.).
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.