How is gender equality linked to how much meat we eat?

Publicly released:
International
Photo by Madie Hamilton on Unsplash
Photo by Madie Hamilton on Unsplash

Men tend to eat meat more often than women, according to international researchers who say the extent of these differences tends to be greater in countries with higher levels of gender equality, and social and economic development. The team analysed survey data from 20,802 participants from 23 countries across North and South America, Europe, and Asia, and also looked at the differing levels of social and economic development, as well as gender equality, across each country. They found that – with the exception of China, India and Indonesia – men tended to eat meat more frequently than women. The authors suggest higher levels of gender equality and development may give women more freedom to choose to eat meat less often, and also enable men to purchase and eat meat more often. The findings also indicate different strategies to encourage reduced meat consumption may be needed depending on the country, the team adds, with both men and women likely to eat more meat overall if they are from a country with higher gender equality.

Media release

From: Springer Nature

Food: Greater gender equality associated with men eating meat more frequently than women

Men tend to eat meat more frequently than women and the extent of the differences in meat consumption frequency between both genders tend to be greater within countries with higher levels of gender equality and social and economic development, according to a study published in Scientific Reports. The authors suggest that this could be due individuals within these countries having greater opportunities to express food preferences.

Christopher Hopwood and colleagues investigated differences in meat consumption between men and women across countries with differing levels of social and economic development — as measured by life expectancy, years of schooling, and gross national income — and gender equality — as measured by economic participation, education levels, political empowerment, and health and survival. They analysed survey data collected in 2021 from 20,802 participants from 23 countries in North and South America, Europe, and Asia. Participants reported their gender and how frequently they ate meat.

The authors found that — with the exception of China, India, and Indonesia — men tended to eat meat more frequently than women. The differences in meat consumption between men and women tended to be greater in countries with higher levels of gender equality and social and economic development, with the greatest differences observed in Germany, Argentina, Poland, and the UK. They also found that men and women from countries with higher levels of gender equality and social and economic development tended to eat meat more often than those from countries with lower levels of social and economic development. Overall meat consumption was highest in Thailand, China, the USA, and Spain.

The authors suggest that higher levels of gender equality and development may provide women with greater freedom to choose to eat meat less often and may also enable men to purchase and eat meat more often. The findings also indicate that different strategies to encourage reduced meat consumption may be needed in countries with differing levels of social and economic development to reduce the environmental impacts of agriculture. They propose that providing consumers with greater opportunities to consume plant-based meat alternatives or cultivated (lab-grown) meat may be more effective within countries with higher levels of development. Providing incentives to produce plant-based meat alternatives or cultivated meat may be more effective within countries with lower levels of development.

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research Springer Nature, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo lifts.
Journal/
conference:
Scientific Reports
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: University of Zurich, Switzerland
Funder: This work was funded by Mercy for Animals, a non-profit organization dedicated to ending animal agriculture. Two authors (CD and AT) are employed by Mercy for Animals. No other authors have competing interests to report.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.