How do newer migraine prevention drugs stack up?

Publicly released:
International; NSW
Photo by Bermix Studio on Unsplash
Photo by Bermix Studio on Unsplash

People with migraine taking newer prevention drugs likely experience two fewer headache days a month, according to international researchers who reviewed 43 studies on migraine prevention drugs to see how the evidence was stacking up for some of the newer drugs on the market. Looking at results of randomised controlled trials with a combined 14,725 patients, the researchers say eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, and atogepant showed the modest, two days a month reduction in headaches. The evidence was weaker for older migraine prevention drugs included in the studies, they say. The researchers also note that most evidence supporting the use of these migraine drugs comes from industry-sponsored studies, and there is a need for more independent research into their effectiveness.

News release

From: American College of Physicians

Newer migraine prevention medications offer modest benefit for chronic migraine

A systematic review of randomized controlled trials evaluated the effectiveness and tolerability of pharmacologic prophylaxis for chronic migraines in adults. The review found that most calcitonin gene–related peptide (CGRP) targeted medications reduce migraine days by about two per month. The review is published in Annals of Internal Medicine.

Researchers from McMaster University and colleagues reviewed 43 randomized clinical trials involving more than 14,700 adults comparing various pharmacologic interventions for chronic migraines with placebo. They found that several newer drugs that target CGRP reduced monthly migraine days by about two days on average and were generally well tolerated. Evidence for older treatments, including botulinum toxin and some traditional oral medications, was weaker or showed higher rates of side effects. The authors conclude that most CGRP‑targeted therapies are likely effective options for preventing chronic migraine, however, there are important limitations to consider. Effects of CGPR-targeted therapies are largely driven by industry-sponsored studies, warranting replication by independent investigators. Additionally, more high-quality studies, including those assessing long-term safety, cost-effectiveness, and adherence, are needed for other treatments.

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research American College of Physicians, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Other American College of Physicians, Web page Patient Summary. The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Journal/
conference:
Annals of Internal Medicine
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, McMaster University, Canada
Funder: None.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.