Media release
From:
Springer Nature
Plants and soils may trade ability to store carbon
When the biomass of plants increases in response to rising carbon dioxide levels, the amount of carbon the soil is able to store decreases, according to an analysis of over 100 experiments published in Nature. Current models of terrestrial carbon sinks do not account for this trade-off, so future projections may need to be revised.
Terrestrial ecosystems remove about 30% of the carbon dioxide emitted by human activities every year. Plants sequester carbon dioxide as they use photosynthesis to fuel their growth, whereas soils lock carbon away as biomass decays. However, as carbon dioxide emissions continue to rise, it is unclear how this carbon sink may respond.
One hypothesis suggests that rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide will increase the ability of both plants and soil to sequester carbon, but César Terrer and colleagues show that this may not be the case. Analysing data from 108 elevated carbon dioxide experiments, the authors reveal an inverse relationship. When plant biomass increases as a result of elevated carbon dioxide levels, storage of carbon in the soil declines. In their experiments, elevated carbon dioxide levels resulted in an increase in soil stocks of carbon in grasslands (by around 8%), but not in forests. This was despite an increase in forest biomass of around 23%.
The authors suggest that this trade-off could be related to the way that plants acquire their nutrients. As plants grow, their roots mine the soil for nutrients. This may decrease the ability of the soil to sequester carbon, the authors conclude.
Attachments
Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public.
Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.
Research
Springer Nature, Web page
The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Journal/
conference:
Nature
Organisation/s:
Western Sydney University, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, USA
Funder:
C.T. was supported by a Lawrence Fellow award through
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). This work was performed under the auspices
of the US Department of Energy by LLNL under contract DE-AC52-07NA27344 and was
supported by the LLNL-Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) programme
under project number 20-ERD-055. J.B.F. contributed to this research from the Jet Propulsion
Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics
and Space Administration. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Funding provided in part
by the NASA Interdisciplinary Science (IDS) programme, and by the US Department of Energy,
Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, Terrestrial Ecosystem
Science Program under Award Numbers DE-SC0008317, DE-SC0016188 and the LLNL Soil
Science Focus Area (SFA) SCW1632. B.A.H. and K.J.v.G. were supported by the US Department
of Energy through the Terrestrial Ecosystem Science Program DE-SC0010632. The FACE
Model-Data Synthesis was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science,
Biological and Environmental Research programme. Oak Ridge National Laboratory is
operated by UT-Battelle LLC under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the US Department of
Energy. The BioCON experiment was funded by the Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER)
grants DEB-0620652, DEB-1234162 and DEB-1831944, Long-Term Research in Environmental
Biology (LTREB) grants DEB-1242531 and DEB-1753859, Biological Integration Institutes grant
NSF-DBI-2021898, Ecosystem Sciences grant DEB-1120064, and Biocomplexity grant DEB-
0322057, and by the US Department of Energy Programs for Ecosystem Research grant
DE-FG02-96ER62291.