EXPERT REACTION: Marking two years since the pandemic became official

Publicly released:
New Zealand; International
PHOTO: Patrick Assale/Unsplash
PHOTO: Patrick Assale/Unsplash

This month marks two years since the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was declared a global pandemic by the WHO. A special, publicly available issue of Science takes a look back with a series of review articles and opinion pieces. One review describes how each of the vaccines and treatments approved to date were built on decades of investment in technology and basic science, while a perspective piece argues this pandemic should be used to better understand what drives diseases to jump from animals to humans.

Media release

From:

Expert Reaction

These comments have been collated by the Science Media Centre to provide a variety of expert perspectives on this issue. Feel free to use these quotes in your stories. Views expressed are the personal opinions of the experts named. They do not represent the views of the SMC or any other organisation unless specifically stated.

Professor Kurt Krause, Infectious Diseases Physician; Professor of Biochemistry, University of Otago

In their review in Science, Edwards et al. are correct to attribute much of the success experienced in the past two years in anti-viral and vaccine development for the Covid-19 pandemic to years of investment in basic and applied research.

Much of this prior work focussed on non-coronaviruses like HIV and HCV, but very important work was done on the epidemic-associated coronaviruses SARS and MERS.

The authors also point out how important It is to maintain strong ongoing capabilities in infectious diseases research, including public health, diagnostics, vaccines and drug discovery, to enable the biomedical community to react quickly and effectively to the next pandemic.

For New Zealand the need for increased investment in infectious diseases research is clear.

Where I differ somewhat with the authors is that I don't think it's practical or wise to have the goal of immediately pre-targeting all viruses that have pandemic potential in order to pre-develop vaccines and drugs against all of them just in case they are needed to address a potential pandemic at some future date. To me this would represent a phenomenal amount of work and it seems a bridge too far. Funding this effort would risk diluting important efforts in other key areas in infectious diseases like antimicrobial resistance as well as other areas of biomedical sciences.

Last updated:  11 Mar 2022 9:49am
Contact information
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.
Declared conflicts of interest "My lab carries out research on anti-viral and anti-bacterial drug discovery and I have received some funding for my research from multiple sources including but not limited to Marsden, MBIE, HRC and RSNZ."

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research AAAS, Web page
Journal/
conference:
Science
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: See papers for author affiliations
Funder: See papers for full details.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.