Common anti-nausea drugs could increase stroke risk

Publicly released:
International
Photo by Ksenia Yakovleva on Unsplash
Photo by Ksenia Yakovleva on Unsplash

Anti-nausea drugs domperidone, metopimazine, and metoclopramide are associated with an increased risk of stroke, according to international researchers. The team used French medication reimbursement data to look for ischaemic stroke trends among people who bought the drugs, which are commonly used to relieve nausea and vomiting related to migraines and cancer treatments. The researchers say all three drugs studies were associated with a higher risk of stroke, especially in the first few days after taking the medication.

Media release

From: The BMJ

Widely used nausea drugs linked to heightened risk of stroke

  • Risk appears to be higher in the first days of use
  • Potential action of these drugs on blood flow to the brain could explain this higher risk

Drugs known as antidopaminergic antiemetics (ADAs) that are widely used to relieve nausea and vomiting caused, for instance, by migraine, chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and after surgery are associated with an increased risk of ischaemic stroke, finds a study published by The BMJ today.

The results show that all three ADAs studied (domperidone, metopimazine, and metoclopramide) were associated with an increased risk, especially in the first days of use, but the highest increase was found for metopimazine and metoclopramide. The researchers suggest that the potential action of ADAs on blood flow to the brain could explain this higher risk.

Like antipsychotics, ADAs are antidopaminergic drugs - they work by blocking dopamine activity in the brain. Antipsychotics have been associated with an increased risk of ischaemic stroke, but whether this risk could extend to other antidopaminergics including ADAs is not known.

To address this gap, a team of researchers in France from Inserm and Bordeaux University (Bordeaux Population Health Centre) and Bordeaux CHU, set out to estimate the risk of ischaemic stroke associated with ADA use in a real world setting.

They identified 2,612 patients from the nationwide French reimbursement healthcare system database (SNDS) with a first ischaemic stroke between 2012 and 2016 and at least one reimbursement for domperidone, metopimazine or metoclopramide in the 70 days before their stroke. Patients had an average age of 72 years and 34% were men.

They compared frequencies of these ADA reimbursements between a risk period (days -14 to -1 before stroke) and three matched reference periods (days -70 to -57, -56 to -43, and -42 to -29 before stroke). 

Patients with stroke were then matched by age, sex, and stroke risk factors to a healthy control group of 21,859 randomly selected people who also received an ADA in the same time period.

Among patients with stroke, 1,250 received an ADA at least once in the risk period and 1,060 in the reference periods. Among the control group, 5,128 and 13,165 received an ADA at least once in the risk and reference periods, respectively. 

After taking account of potentially influential factors, the researchers found that new users of ADA could be at a 3-fold increased risk of stroke shortly after treatment started.

Further analyses by age, sex, and history of dementia showed similar results, with men at highest (a 3.59-fold increased) risk.

The risk appeared to increase for all ADAs, the highest increase being found for metopimazine (a 3.62-fold increase) and metoclopramide (a 3.53-fold increase), both of which are drugs that cross the blood-brain barrier.

This is an observational study, and as such, can’t establish cause, and the researchers point to some limitations that are inherent in database studies, such as a lack of information on prescribed daily dose or duration of ADAs and ischaemic stroke subtypes.

Nevertheless, they say their results show that the risk of ischaemic stroke appears to be associated with ADA use. 

And although further causal inference research is needed to confirm this association in other settings, they suggest that “the higher risk found for drugs crossing the blood-brain barrier suggests a potential central effect, possibly through an action on cerebral blood flow.”

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research The BMJ, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Journal/
conference:
The BMJ
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: Univ. Bordeaux, France
Funder: This work was supported by the French Medicines Agency (Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé, ANSM; grant No 2019S015) in the context of a partnership with the Health Product Epidemiology Scientific Interest Group (EPI-PHARE). The present study is part of the Drugs Systematized Assessment in Real-life Environment (DRUGS-SAFER) research programme. This programme aims at providing an integrated system allowing the concomitant monitoring of drug use and safety in France. The potential impact of drugs, frailty of populations and seriousness of risks drive the research programme. The French Medicines Agency played no role in the study design, conduct, and results interpretation or discussion. This publication represents the views of the authors and does not necessarily represent the opinion of the French Medicines Agency.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.