Should we make climate-polluting companies pay to remove greenhouse gases?

Publicly released:
International

Companies could be charged for the future removal of their net carbon, according to a new suggested tactic to mitigate climate change. The authors propose that carbon debt be treated like financial debt, charging interest for physical liabilities, called ‘Carbon Removal Obligations’ (CROs). It’s hoped that interest payments on the CROs would encourage much more ambitious carbon cuts in the near term, along with earlier use of CO2 removal. Importantly, the authors say the scheme would prevent the cost of CO2 removal from being passed to future generations.

Media release

From: Springer Nature

Charging CO2 emitters on the basis of their responsibility for future net carbon removal could help to mitigate climate change. This approach, published online in Nature this week, addresses the issue of carbon debt repayment upfront and could help to achieve current climate targets.

By the end of this decade, it is predicted that the world will be more than 1.5 °C warmer than pre-industrial times if CO2 emissions remain on pre-pandemic levels. CO2 removal strategies, in which the amount of CO2 removed from the atmosphere exceeds the amount that is generated, are needed to achieve net-negative emissions. However, CO2 removal practices are costly and need related economic policies to be discussed and put into action. Johannes Bednar and colleagues propose a new economic tactic that makes CO2 emitters financially responsible for future CO2 removal. They suggest that carbon debt could be treated like financial debt, including interest payments on physical liabilities, or ‘Carbon Removal Obligations’ (CROs). Under this approach, interest payments on the CROs are expected to induce substantially more-ambitious decarbonization in the near term, alongside earlier and less-aggressive deployment of CO2 removal.

The proposed scheme marks a shift from viewing CO2 emissions as permanent additions to the atmosphere to instead treating them as temporary quantities that are earmarked for removal at the moment of release. Crucially, it is designed to prevent the cost of CO2 removal from being passed to future generations, the authors conclude.

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research Springer Nature, Web page Public link once embargo lifts
Journal/
conference:
Nature
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Austria), University of Oxford (UK), HSE University, St. Petersburg Russian Federation.
Funder: We would like to acknowledge the financial support from the European Research Council Synergy grant ERC-SyG-2013-610028 IMBALANCE-P as well as from the FWF grant P-31796 Medium Complexity Earth System Risk Management (ERM). Support from the HSE University Basic Research Program for Artem Baklanov is gratefully acknowledged.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.