Bees get an F for maths - turns out they were cheating

Publicly released:
Australia; International; NSW
1280px-Honey_bee_(Apis_mellifera) By Charles J. Sharp - Own work, from Sharp Photography, sharpphotography, CC BY-SA 3.0
1280px-Honey_bee_(Apis_mellifera) By Charles J. Sharp - Own work, from Sharp Photography, sharpphotography, CC BY-SA 3.0

There's been a lot of buzz recently about bees' ability to do maths, but it turns out they were probably 'cheating' by using visual clues rather than numbers to solve problems, according to international researchers, including Australians. They tasked honeybees with solving a maths problem widely used to test numerical abilities in animals, and found the bees, just like the rest of us, would rather take a shortcut, estimating quantities using visual cues rather than working with exact numbers. The scientists say the study shows how good bees are at finding the most effective way to solve a problem, and it may be quite different from how we would solve it.

Media release

From: The Royal Society

Non-numerical strategies used by bees to solve numerical cognition tasks

The ability to use numbers is a powerful cognitive capacity for humans. There has been enormous interest in discovering if and how other animals might solve number problems. New work shows that honey bees, and possibly other animals, might be “cheating” on their math tests. Honeybees solved a task widely used to test numerical abilities, but without using number information. In a shortcut, they estimated quantities using simpler visual cues. This work shows how good animals are at finding the most effective way to solve a problem, and it may be quite different to how we would solve it.

B+ student – Honeybees and other animals may have been ‘cheating’ in their maths tests. In this study, honeybees solved a task often used to test numerical abilities, but used simpler visual cues rather than number information. ‘Animals are good at finding the most effective way to solve a problem - it may be quite different to how we would solve it - requiring increased vigilance and cleverness from the experimenter’, the authors said.

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research The Royal Society, Web page Dropbox link to images and videos
Research The Royal Society, Web page The URL will go live at some point after the embargo ends
Journal/
conference:
Proceedings of the Royal Society B
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: Macquarie University, University of Sheffield, UK
Funder: This study was supported by the EPSRC programme grant Brains-on-Board (EP/P006094/1) awarded to J.A.R.M. and E.V. A.B.B. and J.A.R.M. were supported by a Leverhulme visiting professorship. A.B.B. and C.S. were supported by the Templeton World Charity Foundation project number TWCF0266. F.P. was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project no. 31700988). We thank Yonghe Zhou and Yuyi Lu for assistance with the experimental setup in China.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.