Aussie couples still falling into gendered financial stereotypes when kids come along

Publicly released:
Australia; QLD
Photo by Wes Hicks on Unsplash
Photo by Wes Hicks on Unsplash

When Australian couples have children they still often revert to the 'male breadwinner, female carer' stereotype, according to Australian researchers. The team used a long-term household survey to analyse how having children changed the share of income in heterosexual couples. They say after children, there is a substantial decrease in the number of households with equal income coming in from both parents, with an increase in 'male breadwinner' households. They say while households that were previously 'female breadwinner' households tend to gradually return to that state after children, previously equal-income couples often don't return to that arrangement. The researchers say this could be because they are having more children, or the woman's career has taken a hit as a result of having children.

Media release

From: The University of Queensland

A University of Queensland study has shown having a baby negatively affects a mother’s employment earnings for up to 10 years.

Researchers from UQ’s Life Course Centre used data from the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey to investigate the impact of parenthood on earnings across a period spanning 10 years prior to and 10 years after the birth of a child.

Lead author and Master of Philosophy student Ruth Steinbring said that while previous research found an immediate ‘motherhood penalty’ on women’s earnings, this study was one of the first to examine the long-term trajectory of household earnings through the transition into parenthood.

“We know that parenthood is a key contributor to loss of earnings for women, but we did not know whether or at what point women started to regain their lost earnings,” Ms Steinbring said.

“While there is an expectation over the long term that couples will gradually return to pre-parenthood earnings arrangements, our study results do not support this.

“Parenthood affects men and women differently and the gender gap in earnings is still evident up to 10 years after the first birth.”

The study shows the share of households with male breadwinners rises sharply post-parenthood and has still not returned to pre-parenthood levels 10 years on.

It also shows a large decrease in the number of equal-earner households. However there is less fluctuation in the number of female-breadwinner households from pre- to post-parenthood.

Ms Steinbring said it made economic sense for the person who earned more to continue working.

“Our study confirms that parenthood entrenches the male-breadwinner model, but it also shows that there are some couples who make it work with a female breadwinner and we can learn from those households,” Ms Steinbring said.

“Current policy mainly focusses on supporting women after the birth of a child, but our research suggests that improving women’s earnings prior to giving birth can also help improve equality.”

Co-author and Life Course Centre Director Professor Janeen Baxter said the study provides valuable new insights into the role of parenthood in gender inequality over a lifetime.

Professor Baxter said the findings suggest structural, economic and cultural pressures to conform to a male-breadwinner model, and unequal sharing of household and childcaring responsibilities, continued to be a strong influence on post-parenthood earnings.

“This study highlights the need for policymakers to also consider the years prior to parenthood as a key period where targeted supports can foster greater long-term gender equality," Professor  Baxter said.

This study is published in The Australian Journal of Social Issues.

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research Wiley, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Journal/
conference:
Australian Journal of Social Issues
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: The University of Queensland, ARC Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course
Funder: This paper uses unit record data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics Australia (HILDA) Survey. The HILDA project was initiated and is funded by the Australia Government Department of Social Services (DSS) and is managed by the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research (Melbourne Institute). The findings and views reported in this paper, however, are those of the authors and should not be attributed to either the DSS or the Melbourne Institute. This research was supported by the Australian Government through the Australian Research Council's Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course (Project ID CE200100025). The content of this paper does not necessarily reflect the view and opinions of the Life Course Centre or the Department of Education.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.