Are we asking too much of our new teachers?

Publicly released:
Australia; QLD
Photo by Christina @ wocintechchat.com on Unsplash
Photo by Christina @ wocintechchat.com on Unsplash

Beginner teachers could be having a tougher time when they first get into the classroom because of policies emphasising the concept of 'classroom readiness', according to Australian research. The team reviewed research from recent decades on 'classroom readiness', which they say is a term used in policy that means a point where a beginner teacher has passed a set of demonstrable standards, and is now officially ready to enter the classroom. The researchers say reducing the skill of teaching to a set of criteria like that could be depriving young teachers of the support and understanding to thrive when they first enter the classroom, with high levels of burnout and attrition showing a focus on continuous development during their early years is needed.

Media release

From: Taylor and Francis Group

Study finds unfair expectations place extra pressure on new teachers

‘Classroom readiness’ is a policy slogan that fails to reflect real-world teaching challenges, a new study finds.

Experts say standardised tests do not guarantee new teachers can handle classroom complexities and may increase the risk of burnout.

Reforms in teacher education, mentorship and ongoing development matter more than rigid assessments, according to researchers.

Teaching shortages internationally could be worsened by unrealistic expectations placed on new graduates, a new study by QUT researchers reveals.

Published in the peer-reviewed Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, the QUT study reveals that the term ‘classroom readiness’ has become a convenient policy tool rather than a reliable measure of teacher capability.

Researchers say that teaching performance assessments, which are often used to evaluate new teachers, fail to account for the real-world complexities of teaching.

Schools continue to report high levels of teacher burnout and high attrition rates among teachers caused by factors such as teacher shortages, which is beyond the control of teacher education.

The research, led by Associate Professor Rebecca Spooner-Lane and including Associate Professor, Nerida Spina, Ms Elizabeth Briant and Dr Julia Mascadri all from the QUT School of Education, questions whether education boards are measuring the wrong thing by expecting new teachers to meet rigid standards while neglecting the practical and humanistic challenges of the profession.

Associate Professor Spooner-Lane, who specialises in research focused on the professional development and career progression of teachers from graduate teacher through to lead teacher, said ‘classroom readiness’ was more of a policy construct than a genuine assessment of teaching capability.

“The term classroom readiness has been used strategically to justify reforms in teacher education, but our research shows that readiness is not a point-in-time achievement, it’s a professional journey,” she said.

“Our review found that readiness is too multifaceted to be effectively measured by a single assessment.

“While teaching performance assessments aim to standardise and regulate teacher preparation, they risk oversimplifying the demands teachers face in diverse classroom settings.”

The paper says that policies enforcing assessments assume graduates can seamlessly transition into classroom teaching, with evidence that even top performing teachers struggle in their first years without proper support.

“New teachers often enter classrooms facing unrealistic expectations, and are required to manage complex student needs, adapt to curriculum changes and navigate classroom challenges with minimal guidance,” Associate Professor Sponer-Lane said.

“Assessments reduce teacher preparation to a selected set of criteria, ignoring the mentorship, adaptability and professional development needed to thrive.”

In Australia for example, it is assumed that passing an assessment guarantees classroom readiness, but school leaders report that many graduates still require significant training to navigate the profession effectively.

Associate Professor Nerida Spina, co-author of the study, said there was an urgent need to ensure new teachers were well prepared in their initial teacher education degrees, and then well supported once they started work into the profession.

“We cannot expect graduating teachers to step into classrooms as fully-fledged experts from day one,” she said.

“They require structured support systems that guide their early years in the profession, helping them build confidence and competence.

“A teacher’s journey should be one of continuous development, shaped by meaningful mentorship and accessible opportunities for learning. Without these, new educators may struggle to navigate the complexities of real-world teaching.

“Standardised testing alone does not prepare teachers for the realities of the classroom. Instead, we must invest in hands-on training, professional collaboration, and real-world teaching experiences that truly equip them for success.”

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research Taylor and Francis Group, Web page
Journal/
conference:
Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: Queensland University of Technology (QUT)
Funder: None reported
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.