AI may not improve detection of dangerous tumours during colonoscopies

Publicly released:
International
Photo by Michael Dziedzic on Unsplash
Photo by Michael Dziedzic on Unsplash

Artificial intelligence may not increase the ability to detect colorectal cancer during a colonoscopy, according to two international papers investigating the type of tumours it is able to help detect. In the first paper, researchers compared a standard colonoscopy with a computer-assisted colonoscopy in a group of 3000 people being tested for colorectal cancer, and found no significant difference in result between the two groups. In the second paper, researchers compiled the results of 21 previous trials on the subject, and found while AI could potentially increase the capacity to identify growths overall, this was mostly due to their ability to detect less threatening growths that likely do not need intervention.

Media release

From: American College of Physicians

AI not associated with improved detection of advanced colorectal neoplasias during colonoscopy
Abstract: https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M22-2619
URL goes live when the embargo lifts
A randomized controlled trial found that colonoscopy assisted by computer-aided detection (CAD) was not associated with improved detection of advanced colorectal neoplasias.

Screening for colorectal cancer has greatly improved mortality rates due to greater detection of malignant and premalignant lesions. Systems relying on artificial intelligence using deep-learning technology have been linked to improved adenoma detection rates and reduce miss rate, but there are concerns that adenoma detection rates will continue to improve due to better detection of small polyps and nonadvanced adenomas, rather than detection of advanced and clinically significant lesions.

More than 3,000 persons with a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) were randomly assigned to colonoscopy with or without CAD to evaluate the contribution of CAD to colonoscopic detection of advanced colorectal neoplasias, adenomas, serrated polyps, and non-polypoid and right-sided lesions. FIT-positive patients were chosen because this group has the highest prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasias, and therefore offers the best context for investigating the ability of computer aided detection to support the diagnosis of advanced colorectal neoplasias. The researchers found no significant difference in advanced colorectal neoplasia detection rate or the mean number of advanced colorectal neoplasias detected per colonoscopy between the two groups. Small effect was observed in increasing number of nonpolypoid lesions, proximal adenomas and small lesions of 5 mm or less, either colonic polyps in general, and adenomas and serrated polyps in particular, detected per colonoscopy. These findings suggest the need for additional research and more defined detection parameters in CAD before it can be integrated into routine clinical care.

Computer-assisted colonoscopy may increase polyp detection and removal but not cancer detection
Abstract: https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M22-3678
URL goes live when the embargo lifts
A review of 21 randomized trials found that the use of CAD for polyp detection during colonoscopy resulted in increased detection of polyps and polyp removal, but not detection of advanced adenomas, the types of polyps at higher risk of cancer progression.

Artificial intelligence computer-aided detection (CADe) of colorectal neoplasia during colonoscopy may increase adenoma detection rates (ADRs) and reduce adenoma miss rates, but it may increase overdiagnosis and overtreatment of nonneoplastic polyps.

Researchers from Humanitas University conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 randomized controlled trials comprising 18,232 participants. The authors found the use of CADe was associated with a 55 percent relative risk reduction in miss rate of adenoma detection, but it was also associated with an increase in the removal of nonneoplastic polyps. The authors also report that CADe was also associated with a marginal increase in mean inspection time. The authors note that the studies mostly involved experienced gastroenterologists, and CADe programs may be more helpful to less experienced endoscopists.

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research American College of Physicians, Web page Paper 1. The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Research American College of Physicians, Web page Paper 2. The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Editorial / Opinion American College of Physicians, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Journal/
conference:
Annals of Internal Medicine
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomedica de Alicante, Spain (Paper 1), Humanitas University, Italy (Paper 2)
Funder: Paper 1: Medtronic. Paper 2: European Commission Horizon 2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowship.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.