Why some bugs wear bright colours and others prefer camo

Publicly released:
Australia; New Zealand; International
The Saxiocla rubicola bird eating a moth. Credit: Stanislav Harvancik.
The Saxiocla rubicola bird eating a moth. Credit: Stanislav Harvancik.

A global, Australian-led study has found it's the predators and environment that determine whether insects are safer blending into their surroundings, or having bright warning colours telling predators it's not worth eating them. Australian, NZ, and international researchers made over 15,000 paper 'moths' of different colours with mealworms attached, and placed them in forests across six continents. In sites with more wild birds competing to eat insects, warning-coloured 'moths' were more likely to be targeted, and it took longer for birds to learn not to eat them. However, camouflaged 'moths' didn't do as well in places with lots of other camouflaged bugs, since birds learned to spot them - which the authors say could make them more vulnerable to ecological change.

Media release

From: The University of Melbourne

Camouflage or caution? How anti-predator strategies have evolved

Predators and the environment determine why some animals use camouflage to avoid being eaten, while others use bright colours to warn them off, new research reveals.

Published today in the journal Science, the findings help explain the evolution and global distribution of the most common colour strategies used by insects to avoid predators.

The global study took place across six continents and involved over 50 scientific collaborators.

Using the same experiment, researchers deployed more than 15,000 artificial prey with three different colours to investigate which strategy works best to deter predators: a classic warning pattern of orange and black, a dull brown that blends in, and an unusual bright blue and black.

The study’s lead author, University of Melbourne’s Dr Iliana Medina Guzman, said the answer to why some animals use camouflage over warning colours to deter predators turned out to be more complex than expected.

“Our findings showed there is no single best colour strategy to deter predators, but that context is critical,” Dr Medina Guzman, from the School of BioSciences, said.

“The different characteristics of the predator and prey communities, as well as habitat in that part of the globe, heavily decide which strategy performs better in each place.

“This makes sense when we see animals employing so many varying camouflage and warning colour strategies as defence systems all over the world.”

Predators had the biggest influence on which colour strategy was most successful for prey, the study revealed.

“In environments where predators are competing intensely for food, they are more likely to risk attacking prey that might be dangerous or distasteful. Hence, we saw that camouflage worked best in areas with lots of predation,” Dr Medina Guzman said.

“Whereas, in places where cryptic prey (insects who use camouflage) are abundant, hiding becomes less effective, as predators are better at looking for those types of animals.”

The findings help scientists understand why some species, such as the cryptic bogong moth or the brightly coloured harlequin bug, have evolved their strategies against predators.

Dr William Allen, an evolutionary ecologist at Swansea University, in the UK, was the senior author on the research.

“For a long time, scientists have wondered why some animals use one defence strategy over the other and our study sheds important information on how animal communities and the environment influence this,” Dr Allen said.

“We hope our findings can help build better understanding of the evolution and global distribution of the most common antipredator colour strategies in animals.”

Expert Reaction

These comments have been collated by the Science Media Centre to provide a variety of expert perspectives on this issue. Feel free to use these quotes in your stories. Views expressed are the personal opinions of the experts named. They do not represent the views of the SMC or any other organisation unless specifically stated.

Professor Jonathan Waters, Department of Zoology, University of Otago, comments:

"As with our NZ insect study, this new study placed 'model’ insects of different colours in the field - to shed light on how colouration can help individuals avoid being eaten in the wild.
There are 2 widespread adaptive colour strategies: camouflage - to help individuals blend into the background and avoid detection; or alternatively using high contrast warning colours (typically advertising toxicity) to deter potential predators.
Our previous New Zealand study (also published in Science) showed that the effectiveness of warning colours depends heavily on ecological context - the nature of the environment, and the predators living there. Likewise, this new global study reveals nuances regarding the abundance of predators, and light conditions. Camouflage works well in low light conditions (such as in New Zealand forests, where camouflage is clearly an important strategy), but not so well in brightly lit habitats. And, as you might expect, warning colours work best when the potential predators are already familiar with them - suggesting learned experience is important.
From a New Zealand perspective, this study highlights that our endemic moth/butterfly species are heavily dominated by cryptic (camouflaged) species rather than those with warning colours (which are far more common in the tropics). This brings to mind distinctive NZ native species such as the Exquisite Olearia Owlet, the North Island lichen moth, and the green carpet owlet moth, which use colour patterns to blend in with the lichens and mosses on the branches of our native forest trees."
Last updated:  25 Sep 2025 12:51pm
Contact information
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.
Declared conflicts of interest No conflicts of interest.

Multimedia

The Merops apiaster bird eating the Aglais io moth
The Merops apiaster bird eating the Aglais io moth
The Pteruthius aeralatus bird
The Pteruthius aeralatus bird
The Saxicola rubicola bird eating a moth
The Saxicola rubicola bird eating a moth
The native cabbage tree moth blends in beautfully with dead tī kōuka leaves.
The native cabbage tree moth blends in beautfully with dead tī kōuka leaves.
Red admiral buterfly or kahukura meaning ‘red cloak’.
Red admiral buterfly or kahukura meaning ‘red cloak’.
Cinnabar moth, introduced to NZ from England in 1926 to control ragwort.
Cinnabar moth, introduced to NZ from England in 1926 to control ragwort.
Example of a predator: Tomtit or miromiro eating in the forest.
Example of a predator: Tomtit or miromiro eating in the forest.
Predator: Korimako or bellbird.
Predator: Korimako or bellbird.
Journal/
conference:
Science
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: The University of Melbourne, University of Auckland, Western Sydney University
Funder: This work was supported by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (to R.R.C. and F.D.-L.); Melbourne Postdoctoral Fellowship through University of Melbourne (to A.M.F.); National Research Foundation of Korea (RS-2024-00333709 to C.K.); Creative-Pioneering Researchers Program through Seoul National University (to C.K.); Australian Research Council Future Fellowship (FT180100491 to J.Ke.); Research Grant from NCBS-TIFR, India (to K.K.); National Council for Scientific and Technological Development - CNPq (proc.142299/2020-0 to V.M.L.); Agencia Nacional para la Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PICT 2018-03622 to M.C.D.M.); Australian Research Council DECRA (DE200100500 to I.M.); Junior Research Fellowship, UGC-CSIR, Government of India (to A. Pal and A. Paul); Maria Zambrano Fellowship—NextGeneration EU (to O.P.); Max Planck Society (to H.M.R. and R.J.B.); Universidad del Rosario BigGrant (IV-FGD005 to C.S.); Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (to T.N.S. and K.L.-H.); Natural Environment Research Council Independent research fellowship (NE/P018084/1 to J.T.); Czech Science Foundation (19-09323S to A.E., 21-17125S to T.A., and 24-11498S K.D.); Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq; proc. 312847/2022-0 to R.G.-F.); Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) (to R.G.-F.); and Institutional Research Support Grant of the Charles University (SVV 260686/2023 to K.D.).
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.