The world could use 29.5% more antibiotics on livestock by 2040 if we don't make a change

Publicly released:
International
© FAO/Riccardo De Luca. Copyright ©FAO
© FAO/Riccardo De Luca. Copyright ©FAO

While the risks of overusing antibiotics are well-known, international researchers say the world might increase its use of antibiotics on livestock by 29.5% over the next 15 years if changes aren't made. The researchers say increases in demand for animal products as human populations grow means global livestock numbers will likely increase in the coming decades, which could lead to more antibiotics in total being used on this livestock. They modelled various scenarios, and say a 'business-as-usual' approach to antibiotic use on farms would lead to a 29% increase in antibiotic use by 2040 as livestock increases. However, the researchers say moderate reductions in antibiotic use intensity and more productive but less numerous livestock could offset this overall increase, and if the world works together to reduce the intensity of antibiotic use by 50% and reduce the requirement for more livestock, it is possible for the industry to help reduce antibiotic use overall.

Media release

From: Springer Nature

Agriculture: Antibiotic use in livestock projected to rise

Global antibiotic use for livestock could increase by nearly 30% by 2040 compared to 2019, suggests an analysis published in Nature Communications. The findings highlight the need for coordinated global efforts in the livestock sector to bring about reductions in antibiotic use.  

The misuse and overuse of antibiotics are associated with the emergence of antimicrobial resistance, a major global health threat. In response, governments have committed to significantly reducing the quantity of antimicrobials used in the agrifood system by 2030. However, with rising demand for animal-source proteins for human consumption, particularly in regions where livestock biomass is projected to grow due to population increases and rising incomes, it is uncertain how these targets can be met.  

Alejandro Acosta and colleagues estimate future antibiotic use in livestock at global, regional, and subregional levels. They considered different scenarios in which the levels of livestock biomass and antibiotic use intensity (the relative amount of antibiotic used per unit of livestock biomass) varied compared to ‘business-as-usual’ assumptions (where livestock biomass and antibiotic use intensity follow current trends). Their models suggest that under a business-as-usual scenario, antibiotic use quantity could rise to over 143,000 US tons per year by 2040, representing a 29.5% increase from the 2019 baseline. However, projections using alternative scenarios suggest that moderate reductions in antibiotic use intensity (30% decrease) can offset increases in antibiotic use quantity when combined with a reduction in total livestock biomass, achieved through productivity improvements. The largest reduction scenario was found when antibiotic use intensity was reduced by 50% in combination with decreased livestock biomass (achieved through productivity improvements), resulting in an almost 57% decrease in the quantity of antimicrobials used in the sector, with projections dropping to about 62,000 US tons per year by 2040.

The study highlights large regional disparities in predicted antibiotic use, emphasising the need for unified global efforts in managing livestock biomass and reducing antibiotic use intensity. Asia and the Pacific are expected to remain the largest contributors, accounting for 65% of total global use by 2040, followed by South America at approximately 19%. Notably, the regions experiencing the highest growth in antimicrobial use quantity are also set to play a pivotal role in meeting the rising global demand for animal-source foods, driven by population growth and increasing incomes.

The authors note that the accuracy of these projections is limited by gaps in country level reporting, lack of species-specific data, and the absence of antibiotic-class-specific data. Improved data collection and standardised reporting will be needed to improve estimates and enable monitoring towards antibiotic use targets, the authors conclude.

Multimedia

September 2024, United Nations 79th General Assembly (UNGA)
September 2024, United Nations 79th General Assembly (UNGA)
A veterinarian holding an agar plate
A veterinarian holding an agar plate
 November 2023, Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) Assembly
November 2023, Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) Assembly
A sustainable poultry farm
A sustainable poultry farm

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research Springer Nature, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Journal/
conference:
Nature Communications
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Italy
Funder: This research was conducted by the Livestock Policy Lab (LPL), a science-policy platform hosted by the Animal Production and Health Division at the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Weextend our deepest gratitude to FAO, particularly the Animal Production and Health Division and the Fisheries and Aquaculture Division, for the invaluable contributions of its staff and for facilitating access to essential datasets. Our sincere appreciation also goes to the Fleming Fund project for providing the financial support that made this research possible.We wish to acknowledge the WorldOrganization for Animal Health (WOAH), particularly the team of experts from the Antimicrobial Resistance and Veterinary Products Department, for their technical feedback on the preliminary version of the manuscript. Additionally, we are grateful to the Quadripartite AMR Economic Working Group for the engaging discussions and valuable insights that informed this work. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Any errors, omissions, or misinterpretations remain the sole responsibility of the authors.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.