'The Meg' was probably slimmer than in the movie

Publicly released:
Australia; WA
WA Museum
WA Museum

International scientists, including an Australian, say the extinct massive shark, the megalodon (Otodus megalodon or Carcharocles megalodon), may not have been as massive as we thought, as an analysis of a fossilised vertebral column found it had a surprisingly small diameter. Assumptions about the body shape and size of megalodon were previously based mainly on looking at its huge teeth, and researchers had thought it had a stocky body shape similar to a white pointer, but the slim vertebral column suggests it was trimmer than a great white. However, as megalodon is only known from a few fossilised teeth and vertebrae, as well as the vertebral column, exactly what the extinct giant looked like remains mysterious for now.

Media release

From: Western Australian Museum

New scientific paper disputes body shape of extinct megalodon shark

The Western Australian Museum was part of an international team of 26 leading shark palaeontologists and neontologists who have challenged a recently published interpretation of the body shape of the megatooth shark Otodus megalodon.

Otodus megalodon (also referred to as Carcharocles megalodon) is an extinct shark species that lived 16-3.5 million years ago. WA Museum’s Head of Earth and Planetary Sciences Dr Mikael Siversson said that previous research depicted the shark species with a stocky body shape like that of the white shark and other lamnid species, but with the new study disputing this body shape interpretation.

“The mismatch between the stocky build of Otodus megalodon in published palaeoartistic reconstructions and the surprisingly small diameter of the largest known vertebral centra of this species has bothered me for a long time.

“The species had in fact an unusually slender vertebral column, which is at odds with previous reconstructions depicting megalodon as a girthy shark,” Dr Siversson said.

The only fossil material available of this enormous shark comprises associated dentitions, a relatively complete vertebral column and isolated vertebrae and shed teeth.

“Although we have a very good idea about the size of the mouth from associated dentitions seemingly including all tooth positions, other anatomical features such as the shape of the fins and tail are unknown, Dr Siversson said.

“It was refreshing to see such broad and strong support among my peers for a more strictly evidence-based view on the anatomy of this iconic species of extinct shark.

“Going forward, any meaningful discussion on the anatomy of this shark other than the size and robustness of the jaws would require the discovery of more-or-less complete skeletons,” Dr Siversson said.

Multimedia

Dr Mikael Siversson holding tooth of megalodon shark
Dr Mikael Siversson holding tooth of megalodon shark
Megalodon body shape comparison
Megalodon body shape comparison

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research Coquina Press, Web page
Journal/
conference:
Palaeontologia Electronica
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: Western Australian Museum, Curtin University
Funder: National Science Foundation Sedimentary Geology and Paleobiology Award (1830581 to MLG and MAB; 1830858 to KS); University Research Council's Competitive Research Grant, DePaul University, Chicago, Illinois (to KS); Austrian Science Fund (FWF: P33820 to JK).
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.