Should wealthy countries foot the bill for the biodiversity loss in poorer countries?

Publicly released:
International
Photo by Ivars Utināns on Unsplash
Photo by Ivars Utināns on Unsplash

Wealthy countries whose high consumption demands drive exploitation of the environment in poorer countries should pay for the biodiversity loss this causes, according to international researchers. In an opinion piece, the researchers argue a 'loss and damage' system similar to that which was discussed at COP27 around climate change should also be implemented for biodiversity loss. They say this is because while biodiversity loss is happening everywhere similar to climate change, richer countries consume more but destructive expansion of mining, agriculture and deforestation predominantly happens in poorer countries.

Media release

From: Springer Nature

Comment: Rich nations should pay for the loss and damage of biodiversity loss

Financial compensation should be paid by rich nations for the loss and damage of biodiversity disproportionately affecting the Global South, argue Dilys Roe and co-authors in a Comment piece in Nature Ecology & Evolution.

‘Loss and damage’ is a familiar concept in climate change negotiations: at the 2022 United Nations COP27 climate conference, dedicated arrangements were established to pay for the impacts of climate change in countries of the Global South through direct finance. This concept acknowledges not only the greater vulnerability of those countries to climate change, but also the culpability of rich nations in creating the problem.

Roe and co-authors highlight similarities with biodiversity loss, which is driven by habitat loss and over-exploitation of natural systems to meet the consumption demands primarily of the Global North. Like climate change, biodiversity loss is happening everywhere, but the opportunities for destructive expansion of mining, agriculture and deforestation have been predominantly located in poorer nations. For local people, this means loss of resources for food and energy, fewer income opportunities, and losses of territory and of cultural values. The authors discuss how potential economic opportunities for these countries are undermined by historical injustices and power imbalances.

The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF), and the linked decision on resource mobilization, agreed at the biodiversity COP15 in 2022, specified that countries of the Global North should pay more to halt and reverse biodiversity loss — but it did not discuss compensation. “Going forward … there would be a case for countries of the Global South to push for loss and damage-type discussions through the GBF Fund”, the authors conclude.

This press release refers to a Nature Ecology & Evolution Comment piece, not a Nature Ecology & Evolution research paper or article. Comment pieces are topical, authoritative Op-Eds pertaining to scientific research and its ramifications.

***

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research Springer Nature, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Journal/
conference:
Nature Ecology & Evolution
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: International Institute for Environment and Development, UK
Funder: The authors declare no competing interests
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.