EXPERT REACTION: Repairing the gaps in women’s health research

Publicly released:
Australia; International
PHOTO: Emma Simpson/Unsplash
PHOTO: Emma Simpson/Unsplash

Medicine has historically overlooked the impact of sex and gender, but in a new  article, overseas researchers argue that including women in medical research is only the first step in repairing this knowledge gap. Although inclusion is important, they say it still operates within a scientific system where research focuses on the male body. For women to be truly considered in research, there needs to be deeper thought about how sex- and gender-specific variables may influence the measured outcomes of any particular study.

Expert Reaction

These comments have been collated by the Science Media Centre to provide a variety of expert perspectives on this issue. Feel free to use these quotes in your stories. Views expressed are the personal opinions of the experts named. They do not represent the views of the SMC or any other organisation unless specifically stated.

Anjuli Muller, PhD Student on The Co-production Project, Te Pūnaha Matatini and Massey University, comments:

You might have noticed that about half the people in the world are women. Sometimes these women have health problems. Historically health and medical research has focused on either studying the male body as default, or more recently, using data that has not been separated for sex or gender differences. This has resulted in a lack of research about women’s health – from how medications are metabolised, to whether menstrual cups are actually safe, to understanding chronic health conditions that disproportionately impact women.

"This paper explores how we need to implement policies that create solutions that take into account the complexity of sex and gender, so we can increase the amount of research that is relevant to more than just the male body.

"Health research needs to consider more human diversity to improve healthcare for those who are currently under cared for, such as Indigenous peoples, disabled, trans, nonbinary and those with sex differences. Going beyond simply including these people in research, the authors explore how research needs to be carried out with care and consideration to ensure discrimination and exclusion is not reinforced.

"I’m part of a team that has co-created a library of health-related research questions that are a priority to women in Aotearoa New Zealand. The women we engaged with were enthusiastic to be involved in research that centred on their lived experiences. Our work showed how we can carry out better research and reinforced how women have been let down by the health research system in the past.

"Transdisciplinary research with a public participatory approach is key to carrying out health research that embraces the complexity of human differences – resulting in better health for everybody.

Last updated:  05 Mar 2025 12:07pm
Contact information
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.
Declared conflicts of interest No conflicts of interest.

Multimedia

title goes here

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research AAAS, Web page This paper will be available after the embargo lifts.
Journal/
conference:
Science Advances
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: The University of New South Wales, Deakin University
Funder: Funding: S.L. is supported by an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship (FT10100278). Competing interests: B.M.G. and S.H. work for the Centre for Sex and Gender Equity in Health and Medicine, which is funded by The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Australia. A.W. and K.W. work on the MESSAGE project, which is funded by The Wellcome Trust. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.