People who never have friends or family over could be at a higher risk of dying

Publicly released:
International
Photo by Kelsey Chance on Unsplash
Photo by Kelsey Chance on Unsplash

People who are never visited by friends or family could be at higher risk of dying, according to international researchers investigating the link between loneliness and death risk. The team used data from about 450,000 adults in the UK Biobank study, and asked them questions about their level of social interaction; how frequently they could confide in someone, how frequently they felt lonely, how often friends and family visited, whether they did weekly social activities and if they lived alone. Following up over a decade later, the researchers say all five of these factors appeared to influence the participants' death risk, with a higher death risk most strongly linked to never having visitors. The researchers note this study is reliant on relatively simple, self-reported data, however they say it could help inform future research on the risks of loneliness and how to counter them.

Media release

From: Springer Nature

Health: Lack of friend or family visits is associated with increased risk of dying *PRESS BRIEFING*

Never being visited by friends or family is associated with an increased risk of dying, according to a study published in BMC Medicine. The authors suggest that their findings could be used to help identify patients at a higher risk of dying due to social factors, and to develop more effective interventions to combat the increased risk of death associated with social isolation.

Although previous research has identified associations between deaths due to any causes and both a ‘sense of loneliness’ and living alone, the combined impacts of different types of social interaction on mortality has been unclear.

Hamish Foster and colleagues used data from 458,146 adults recruited to UK Biobank to investigate the association between mortality and five types of social interaction. Participants were recruited between 2006 and 2010 and had a mean age of 56.5 years. The participants completed a questionnaire on recruitment during which they answered questions about five types of social interaction: how often they were able to confide in someone close to them and how often they felt lonely (subjective measures); and how often they were visited by friends and family, how often they participated in a weekly group activity, and whether they lived alone (objective measures). After a median 12.6 years follow-up, 33,135 of the participants had died based on linked death certificates.

The authors found that all five types of social interaction were independently associated with mortality from any cause. Overall, increased mortality was more strongly associated with low levels of the objective measures of social interaction compared to low levels of the subjective measures. The strongest association was for individuals who were never visited by friends or family, who were at a 39% associated increased risk of death. Furthermore, the benefit of participating in weekly group activities was not observed in participants who never had friends or family visit — participants who never received visits but did join group activities had a comparable associated increased risk of death to those who had no visits and joined no activities (50% and 49% respectively). However, participants who received friend or family visits on at least a monthly basis had a significantly lower associated increased mortality risk, suggesting that there was potentially a protective effect from this social interaction.

The authors caution that although the overall strength of association is likely to be generalisable, the sample data from UK Biobank is not fully representative of the general UK population, and that the social interaction measures they assessed were self-reported and relatively simple. The authors suggest that further research could investigate the effects of other types of social interaction on mortality, or explore how much change in a type of interaction is needed to best benefit socially isolated people.

Attachments

Note: Not all attachments are visible to the general public. Research URLs will go live after the embargo ends.

Research Springer Nature, Web page The URL will go live after the embargo ends
Journal/
conference:
BMC Medicine
Research:Paper
Organisation/s: University of Glasgow, UK
Funder: We thank the UK Biobank participants. This research uses data provided by patients and collected by the NHS as part of their care and support and used data assets made available by National Safe Haven as part of the Data and Connectivity National Core Study, led by the Health Data Research UK in partnership with the Office for National Statistics and funded by UK Research and Innovation (research which commenced between 1 October 2020 to 31 March 2021 grant ref MC_PC_20029; 1 April 2021 to 30 September 2022 grant ref MC_PC_20058).
Media Contact/s
Contact details are only visible to registered journalists.